December 2014
Volume 14, Issue 15
Free
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2014
When increments match decrements
Author Affiliations
  • Marianne Maertens
    Technical University of Berlin
  • Robert Shapley
    Center for Neural Science, New York University
Journal of Vision December 2014, Vol.14, 40. doi:10.1167/14.15.40
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Marianne Maertens, Robert Shapley; When increments match decrements. Journal of Vision 2014;14(15):40. doi: 10.1167/14.15.40.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

An important theme in lightness research has been the perceptual separation between increments and decrements. Some authors have reported that increments are never matched in lightness with decrements (e.g. Heinemann, 1955; Whittle and Challands, 1969; Gilchrist, 2006). And in fact, if lightness depended only on edge contrast, then increments, which have positive contrast, should always appear relatively lighter than decrements, which have negative contrast. This is indeed what is often found when geometrically and photometrically simple displays are used as stimuli. The perceptual increment/decrement split is supported by neurophysiological data pointing to a fundamental separation between neurons driven by darks (OFF neurons) and neurons driven by lights (ON neurons) in primary visual cortex (e.g. Yeh et al., 2009; Kremkow et al., 2014). Here, we present results from an experiment on lightness judgments in which we used customized checkerboards as stimuli. The checkerboards appeared more realistic with respect to their organization in depth as well as their photometric properties. We found that, for lightness judgments involving comparisons between regions that differed in illumination, observers matched increments with decrements without difficulty and were satisfied with their matches. These results indicate that there is a processing mechanism which transforms a lightness signal that is only dependent on local edge contrast into a representation that depends on edge contrast and context.

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×