March 2012
Volume 53, Issue 14
Free
ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract  |   March 2012
Patient Perception Of Electronic Medical Records In The University Of Virginia Ophthalmology Clinic
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Bina Patel
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
  • Meenakshi Chaku
    Department of Ophthalmology, Boston University, Boston, Maine
  • Smith Mary
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
  • Peter A. Netland
    Department of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
  • Footnotes
    Commercial Relationships  Bina Patel, None; Meenakshi Chaku, None; Smith Mary, None; Peter A. Netland, None
  • Footnotes
    Support  None
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science March 2012, Vol.53, 1428. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bina Patel, Meenakshi Chaku, Smith Mary, Peter A. Netland; Patient Perception Of Electronic Medical Records In The University Of Virginia Ophthalmology Clinic. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53(14):1428.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Purpose: : This study investigates patients’ perceptions of service quality under the adoption of an electronic medical record (EMR) in the ophthalmology clinic at the University of Virginia.

Methods: : This was an IRB approved prospective study assessing patient satisfaction with EMR at the University of Virginia Department of Ophthalmology. Patients were surveyed about satisfaction, physician-patient relationship, and clinic efficiency with regards to EMR. The use of the MyChart function (allowing patient to access their own records) and e-prescribing were also assessed.

Results: : Seventy-five patients were surveyed. The mean age was 63 years old, and the gender distribution was 53% female and 47% male. The majority (95%) of the patients noticed the implementation of the EMR system in the clinic. 41% of these patients had graduated from college and 50% were familiar with computers. 35% of patients felt that the EMR system had improved their health care. Overall Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores were unchanged after implementation of the EMR compared with before implementation. 46% agreed that the physician-patient relationship was not affected. 76% of the patients reported efficiency of the clinic improved with EMR implementation. 54% were not aware of the MyChart function. Of those who were aware, 58% felt that it was a useful feature. 48% of patients agreed that the electronic prescription function facilitated obtaining their medications.

Conclusions: : The implementation of EMR does not appear to affect patient satisfaction during a clinical encounter. Ancillary features such as the MyChart function and electronic prescriptions are added benefits of a paperless system from the patient perspective.

Keywords: clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: health care delivery/economics/manpower • clinical (human) or epidemiologic studies: systems/equipment/techniques 
×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×