September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Perceptual Consequences of Elongated Eyes
Author Affiliations
  • Guido Maiello
    UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, UK Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
  • William Harrison
    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
  • Fuensanta Vera-Diaz
    New England College of Optometry, Boston, MA
  • Peter Bex
    Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 111. doi:10.1167/15.12.111
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Guido Maiello, William Harrison, Fuensanta Vera-Diaz, Peter Bex; Perceptual Consequences of Elongated Eyes. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):111. doi: 10.1167/15.12.111.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Myopic eyes are elongated compared to the eyes of normally-sighted, emmetropic observers. This simple observation gives rise to an empirical question: what are the physiological and perceptual consequences of an elongated retinal surface? To address this question, we developed a geometric model of emmetropic and myopic retinae, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data [Atchison et al. (2005)], from which we derived psychophysically-testable predictions about visual function. We input range image data of natural scenes [Howe and Purves (2002)] to the geometric model to statistically estimate where in the visual periphery perception may be altered due to the different shapes of myopic and emmetropic eyes. The model predicts that central visual function should be similar for the two eye types, but myopic peripheral vision should differ regardless of optical correction. We tested this hypothesis by measuring the fall-off in contrast sensitivity with retinal eccentricity in emmetropes and best-corrected myopes. The full contrast sensitivity function (CSF) was assessed at 5, 10 and 15 degrees eccentricity using an adaptive testing procedure [Vul et al. (2010)]. Consistent with our model predictions, the area under the log CSF decreases in the periphery at a faster rate in best-corrected myopic observers than in emmetropes. Our modeling also revealed that a target at a given eccentricity projects onto a larger area of peripheral retinal for myopic than emmetropic eyes. This raises the possibility that crowding zones - the area over which features are integrated - may differ between eye types. We measured crowding zones at 5, 10 and 15 degrees of eccentricity using a 26 AFC letter identification task and found no significant differences between myopic and emmetropic observers. This suggests that crowding depends on spatial rather than retinal feature separation, which implies differences in the retino-cortical transformations in myopes and emmetropes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×