September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Holistic Processing Supports Familiarity-Based Associative Recognition for Faces
Author Affiliations
  • Mitchell Meltzer
    The University of Texas at Dallas
  • Gowtham Ganesan
    The University of Texas at Dallas
  • Michelle Min
    The University of Texas at Dallas
  • James Bartlett
    The University of Texas at Dallas
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 161. doi:10.1167/15.12.161
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Mitchell Meltzer, Gowtham Ganesan, Michelle Min, James Bartlett; Holistic Processing Supports Familiarity-Based Associative Recognition for Faces. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):161. doi: 10.1167/15.12.161.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Associative recognition memory is measured by assessing discrimination between copies of studied items (intact items) and re-combinations of parts of studied items (conjunction items). Such intact/conjunction (I/C) discrimination has often been thought to require recollection, a process supporting the retrieval of qualitative information about a previous encounter. However, recent findings indicate that recognition of associations encoded in a holistic or unitized fashion can rely on familiarity, a mnemonic signal varying only in strength. To test this possibility, we applied a modified process dissociation procedure to an associative recognition paradigm for four classes of stimuli; upright faces, which are thought to be processed in a unitized or holistic fashion, inverted and misaligned faces, both thought to be processed in a part-based fashion, and faces which were both inverted and misaligned. Participants studied a list of faces, and were presented with intact, conjunction, and new faces at test. I/C discrimination was then compared for “exclusion” participants, for whom such discrimination was encouraged, and “inclusion” participants, for whom it was discouraged. According to process dissociation logic, familiarity-based associative recognition is inferred if exclusion and inclusion participants exhibit similar levels of I/C discrimination. By contrast, greater I/C discrimination in the exclusion condition as compared to the inclusion condition with no corresponding group difference in intact/new discrimination indicates recollection-based associative recognition. Consistent with previous findings, a negligible I/C discrimination advantage for exclusion versus inclusion participants was found with upright faces. Howevever, a robust I/C discrimination advantage for exclusion participants over inclusion participants was found with inverted-misaligned faces, consistent with the idea that such stimuli were processed in a part-based fashion. Broadly speaking, our results suggest that holistic processing of faces supports the use of familiarity in associative recognition, and that such processing is susceptible to a combination of face inversion and face misalignment.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×