September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Prefrontal neurons represent comparisons of motion directions in the contralateral and the ipsilateral visual fields
Author Affiliations
  • Kostas Michalopoulos
    Dept. of Neurobiology & Anatomy and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester
  • Philip Spinelli
    Dept. of Neurobiology & Anatomy and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester
  • Tatiana Pasternak
    Dept. of Neurobiology & Anatomy and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 482. doi:10.1167/15.12.482
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kostas Michalopoulos, Philip Spinelli, Tatiana Pasternak; Prefrontal neurons represent comparisons of motion directions in the contralateral and the ipsilateral visual fields. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):482. doi: 10.1167/15.12.482.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Neurons in the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) are active when monkeys decide whether two stimuli, S1 and S2, separated by a delay, move in the same or in different directions.Their responses show direction selectivity reminiscent of activity in motion processing area MT, and during S2, their responses are modulated by the remembered direction. A similar modulation, termed comparison effect (CE), has also been observed in area MT. These parallels between the two areas are consistent with their connectivity, although the nature of this connectivity suggests a possibility of asymmetries in the way contralateral and ipsilateral motion is represented in the LPFC during the motion tasks. Specifically, while signals about the contralateral motion reach LPFC directly from MT of the same hemisphere, ipsilateral motion processed by MT in the other hemisphere can only reach the LPFC indirectly via callosal connections from the opposite LPFC. We explored the role of direct and indirect motion signals in the generation of the comparison effects by examining responses of LPFC to contralateral and ipsilateral stimuli during S2. The CE was measured by comparing responses to identical S2 stimuli on trials when S2 was preceded by S1 moving in the same direction (S-trials) with trials when it was preceded by S1 moving in a different direction (D-trials). ROC analysis revealed two distinct groups of neurons preferring either S-trials or D-trials. Although these CE effects were equally likely to occur for ipsilateral and contralateral stimuli, the signals for the contralateral hemifield appeared about 90ms earlier, a likely reflection of direct connectivity with area MT. These results demonstrate that the comparison between the current and the remembered stimulus can be carried out in the LPFC even in the absence of direct inputs from area MT.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×