September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Motion encoding in human being and praying mantis investigated with a masking paradigm
Author Affiliations
  • Jenny Read
    Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University
  • Natalie Busby
    Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University
  • William Herbert
    Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University
  • Sandra Arranz-Paraíso
    Departmento de Psicología Básica I, Complutense University of Madrid
  • Lisa Jones
    Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University
  • Vivek Nityananda
    Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University
  • Ghaith Tarawneh
    Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University
  • Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
    Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University Departmento de Psicología Básica I, Complutense University of Madrid
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 483. doi:10.1167/15.12.483
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jenny Read, Natalie Busby, William Herbert, Sandra Arranz-Paraíso, Lisa Jones, Vivek Nityananda, Ghaith Tarawneh, Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; Motion encoding in human being and praying mantis investigated with a masking paradigm. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):483. doi: 10.1167/15.12.483.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The existence of multiple channels selective for spatial frequency in human motion perception has been shown by masking experiments (Anderson & Burr, 1989). We examined this in humans and praying mantises. The “signal” stimuli were vertically-oriented sinusoidal luminance gratings of either Low or High spatial frequency, moving either left or right with a temporal frequency of 8Hz. Signals were masked by temporally broadband noise, with no net energy in either direction. The noise was spatially band-pass, centered on either Low or High spatial frequency. Human subjects pressed a button to report motion direction; for mantises, a human observer blind to the stimulus judged the direction of the mantis optomotor response. The Low and High spatial frequencies were chosen for each species such that contrast sensitivity was roughly equal for both. For mantises, we used 0.04 and 0.2 cpd (2.3 octaves apart); for humans, we used 0.4 and 2 cpd (2.3oct), and also 0.2 and 4 cpd (4.3oct). For humans, at 2.3oct separation, contrast thresholds at both signal frequencies were increased by noise at the other frequency, with the Low threshold increased more by High noise. At 4.3oct, the Low threshold was still affected by High noise, but not vice versa. This implies the existence of at least two mechanisms: a broadband motion sensor which detects both 0.2 and 4 cpd, and a narrower-band, higher-frequency sensor which detects 4cpd but not 0.2cpd. For mantises, at 2.3oct separation, thresholds at both Low and High frequencies were increased by noise at the “other” frequency, but the High threshold was increased more by Low noise: the opposite to humans. Thus if mantises have >1 motion sensor, the lower-frequency sensor is narrower-band. Many aspects of motion perception are surprisingly similar in insects and humans, but this finding represents a novel difference.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×