September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Blinking by Surprise: Eye-Blink Rate and Latency Uncover Stimulus Predictability
Author Affiliations
  • Yoram Bonneh
    Department of Human Biology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
  • Moshe Fried
    Goldschleger Eye Research Institute, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel
  • Yael Adini
    The Institute for Vision Research, Kiron, Israel
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 779. doi:10.1167/15.12.779
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yoram Bonneh, Moshe Fried, Yael Adini; Blinking by Surprise: Eye-Blink Rate and Latency Uncover Stimulus Predictability. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):779. doi: 10.1167/15.12.779.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Background: Spontaneous eye-blinking is known to serve an important physiological function, but recent evidence show that it is also linked with cognitive processes. Here we show that the eye-blinks, although rare, are similar to microsaccades in their modulation pattern in response to transient perceptual events, including the temporal dependencies on preceding events, which uncover stimulus predictability. Method: During fixation observers (n=8) viewed and silently counted sequences of 100 randomly-ordered stimuli of two types, presented at 1Hz repetition-rate. These included small patches of contrast (high/low), color (red/blue) and audio-visual stimuli (beep/circle), with an additional go/no-go CPT experiment (n=22 observers, 20min-long, 0.5Hz-rate) on target position. Eye-tracking data were used to compute the average latencies of the blinks (if present) and their rate modulation following stimulus onset. Results: The overall blink-rate varied across observers and conditions (1-80% of trials, 20-60% on-average). Blinking was inhibited around stimulus onset in all conditions, with a pattern generally similar to that observed with microsaccades, including higher-magnitude and shorter-latency for higher contrast. For the audio-visual and CPT experiments, repetition (e.g. sound after a sequence of sounds) decreased the inhibition-rebound latency and magnitude, while change (e.g. sound after a sequence of visual-patches) increased them. The magnitude of these effects changed systematically with the number of preceding items (10-20ms per item, ~100ms total). The contrast experiment showed only a blink-rate increase for high-contrast patches preceded by low-contrast sequences. Conclusion: Eye-blinks, like microsaccades, obey a general pattern of oculomotor inhibition in a lawful and precise manner. This inhibitory pattern depends on stimulus saliency and in some cases on the relation between the current and preceding events, with higher-rate and delayed blinking for "surprise", which we account for by a simple prediction-error model. Given the sparse and apparently imprecise pattern of blinking, reading the current findings might induce "blinking by surprise".

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.