September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Efficient coding provides a better account of systematic biases in locomotor space perception than does action ability
Author Affiliations
  • Jaehyun Oh
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Abigail Robinson
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Christopher Thomson
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Ruth Talbot
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Catherine Norris
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
  • Frank Durgin
    Department of Psychology, Swarthmore College
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 1079. doi:10.1167/15.12.1079
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jaehyun Oh, Abigail Robinson, Christopher Thomson, Ruth Talbot, Catherine Norris, Frank Durgin; Efficient coding provides a better account of systematic biases in locomotor space perception than does action ability. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):1079. doi: 10.1167/15.12.1079.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Quantitative predictions of egocentric distance and geographical slant perception may be derived from dense coding (scale expansion) in angular variables (Durgin & Li, 2011). In particular, distance/height matching tasks can be accounted for by measured biases in perceived direction (elevation) relative to the horizon (Li et al., 2011). However, substantial interest has accumulated for studies arguing that perception is affected by physiological factors such as BMI and age. We used a cross-sectional methodology to look at space perception across the adult lifespan (ages 18-72). We examined performance in several distance, height, and slant tasks including estimation and perceptual matching. We also measured factors concerning specialized knowledge (golfers and skiers know more about distance and slope estimation, respectively), physiology (age, BMI), and personality (e.g., Agreeableness) that might influence performance. Participants (N=106) included college students (N=58), but also non-student members of the nearby community (N=48). Consistent with coding efficiency theory, slant, distance and height estimates closely accord with the angular expansion account: Distances were underestimated (0.72 of actual distance); height was overestimated (1.11 of actual height) and egocentric distance-height matching performance (mean ratio: 1.53) accorded well with the ratio between estimate ratios (i.e., 1.54). Contrary to the action-ability hypothesis, participants defined as obese by CDC guidelines (mean BMI = 35.2) tended to underestimate distance more than those defined as normal. Slant overestimates were consistent with scale expansion, but were also affected reliably both by knowledge and by age. Although obese adults tended to give higher slant estimates, the reliable effect of age on slant estimation was opposite to the predictions of action ability (older adults gave lower slant estimates). Whereas some aspects of the slant results could be used to support an action-ability account, the data as a whole contradict the action-ability account. The data quantitatively support the coding efficiency account.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×