September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Free
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Decoding the emerging representation of degraded visual objects in the human brain.
Author Affiliations
  • Tijl Grootswagers
    Perception in Action Research Centre, Department of Cognitive Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Centre for Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  • Thomas Carlson
    Perception in Action Research Centre, Department of Cognitive Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia Centre for Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 1087. doi:10.1167/15.12.1087
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Tijl Grootswagers, Thomas Carlson; Decoding the emerging representation of degraded visual objects in the human brain.. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):1087. doi: 10.1167/15.12.1087.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Object recognition is fast and reliable, and works even when our eyes are focused elsewhere. The aim of our study was to examine how the visual system compensates for degraded inputs in object recognition by looking at the time course of the brain's processing of naturally degraded visual object stimuli. The study used a set of 48 images depicting real world objects (24 animate and 24 inanimate). In experiment 1, we degraded the images by varying the simulated focus, such that each image was equally recognizable. In experiment 2, we presented the intact and out-of-focus images to participants, while their brain activity was recorded using magnetoencephalography (MEG). In the scanner, participants were asked to categorize the objects as animate or inanimate as quickly and accurately as possible. We predicted a behavioural reaction time effect and accordingly observed degraded objects were recognized 22ms slower. Time resolved multivariate pattern analysis was used to decode category (animacy) membership, as well as object identity for all possible pairwise exemplar comparisons as a function of time. In the decoding analysis, we observed lower decoding performance for degraded images overall; and the decoding onset and peak for degraded stimuli were 15ms slower. We assessed several models to explain the behavioural reaction time difference, including distance-based models, which predict reaction times based on exemplar decodability, as well as time-based models, which use the decoding onset and peak. Our analysis shows that distance based models are better predictors. These findings suggest that the time decodable information emerges is less important for determining reaction time behaviour than the quality of the representation (decodability).

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×