September 2015
Volume 15, Issue 12
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2015
Object-based attention influences saccade latency
Author Affiliations
  • Gozde Senturk
    Department of Psychology, Michigan State University
  • Adam Greenberg
    Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
  • Taosheng Liu
    Department of Psychology, Michigan State University
Journal of Vision September 2015, Vol.15, 1262. doi:10.1167/15.12.1262
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Gozde Senturk, Adam Greenberg, Taosheng Liu; Object-based attention influences saccade latency. Journal of Vision 2015;15(12):1262. doi: 10.1167/15.12.1262.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In the influential two-rectangle paradigm, attention is preferentially allocated to cued objects over noncued objects (Egly et al, 1994). Improved performance within the cued object manifests itself as a manual reaction time and accuracy advantage. However, no study to date has systematically investigated how saccadic reaction time is affected by object-based attention. Our goal is to determine whether saccade latencies are affected by space-based attention alone or whether object-based attention also plays a role. We employed a modified version of the classic two-rectangle paradigm coupled with a saccade reaction time task. Two horizontal or vertical rectangles (orientation blocked), were presented with an exogenous spatial cue flashed at one end of one rectangle. A target gray disk then appeared at one end of one object on 80% of trials (20% target absent). Of target present trials, 75% were valid trials in which the target appeared at the cued location, and on invalid trials (25%) the target appeared equally likely at the uncued end of the cued object (invalid-same object), or at an equidistant location on the uncued object (invalid-different object). Participants were instructed to make a single saccade to the target. Results showed that the saccadic latency was fastest on valid trials. Moreover, saccadic latency was significantly faster during invalid-same object trials versus invalid-different object trials. This effect was found for both the vertical and horizontal rectangle configurations. These results indicate that the oculomotor system is not only involved in location-based saccade preparation, but it is also guided by object-based attention. The eye-movement planning system may, therefore, be subject to the same boundary conditions that determine the representational basis of attentional selection in the visual scene.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2015


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.