August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Pupil dilation indexes effort exertion during the configuration of attentional control setting
Author Affiliations
  • Jessica Irons
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
  • Andrew Leber
    Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 86. doi:10.1167/16.12.86
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jessica Irons, Andrew Leber; Pupil dilation indexes effort exertion during the configuration of attentional control setting. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):86. doi: 10.1167/16.12.86.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Attentional control settings bias the visual system to prioritize task-relevant features and properties in the environment. While a great deal of research has investigated the kinds of control settings at our disposal (e.g., shape, color, oddballs, etc), little is known about how individuals choose these settings. Some researchers have speculated that we choose the settings requiring the least cognitive effort. However, before this speculation can be addressed, it is necessary to determine if the amount of effort required to establish control varies across different control settings. Here, we use pupillometry to measure preparatory effort for two types of control settings. In two experiments (total N = 28), participants performed a visual search task containing two targets: an "easy" target (a salient color singleton, e.g. red amongst blue items) or a "difficult" target (a less salient shape singleton, square amongst diamonds). On each trial, participants were instructed to make a saccade to one of the two targets, which was cued by a tone at the start of the trial. We measured pupil dilation, a well-established indicator of cognitive effort, focusing specifically on the preparatory period between the tone and the presentation of the search display (3.5 seconds). In both experiments, pupil dilation was larger during preparation for the difficult shape target than the easy color target. These results show that the amount of effort required to configure attentional control varies depending on the expected target properties. Moreover, the results provide a basis for the view that effort may play a key role in how individuals choose their attentional control settings.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×