August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Decoding direction of binocular motion from human visual cortex
Author Affiliations
  • Andrew Haun
    Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Jacqueline Fulvio
    Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • Martijn Barendregt
    Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University
  • Bas Rokers
    Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 181. doi:10.1167/16.12.181
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Andrew Haun, Jacqueline Fulvio, Martijn Barendregt, Bas Rokers; Decoding direction of binocular motion from human visual cortex. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):181. doi: 10.1167/16.12.181.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

To perceive 3D motion, 2D motion signals from the two eyes must be combined. Previous work has shown that 2D motion direction can reliably be decoded from MRI BOLD activity throughout visual cortex. 3D motion presents a special case for motion encoding and decoding, since 2D motion direction can be inferred from monocular signals, but 3D motion requires that signals from both eyes are combined. Here we investigated if 3D motion direction can be reliably decoded from visual cortex. We measured the BOLD response (3 mm isotropic resolution) of human visual cortex to binocular stimuli moving in one of eight directions (leftward/rightward, approaching/receding, and the 4 intermediate directions), while observers performed a fixation task. The approaching/receding stimuli avoided the possibility of being decoded from spatiotopic cues, known to facilitate decoding of 2D motion direction (Wang, Merriam, et al, JoN 2014). We subjected the BOLD response to MVPA decoding analyses (ROI-wise or searchlight-wise). We found that the BOLD response is highly informative about 2D direction across visual cortex (V1, V2, V3, MT+, and beyond), replicating previous findings. BOLD response is less informative about 3D direction, with information concentrated in later areas (V3, MT, IPS). Interestingly, decoding errors for the direction of 3D motion mirror the typical perceptual errors in the perception of 3D motion (Fulvio, Rosen & Rokers APP 2015). Specifically, approaching and receding directions tend to be confused both perceptually and by the decoder. These results suggest that 3D motion is encoded by later visual areas. The limitations in spatial resolution of the BOLD signal are consistent with poor 3D motion decoding in V1. Finally, the neural and behavioral confusion of 3D motion stimuli may have a common basis.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×