August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Is the motor contagion effect an artifact of eye movements?
Author Affiliations
  • Merryn Constable
    Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto
  • Tiffany Lung
    Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto
  • John de Grosbois
    Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto
  • Luc Tremblay
    Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto
  • Jay Pratt
    Department of Psychology, University of Toronto
  • Timothy Welsh
    Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, University of Toronto
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 275. doi:10.1167/16.12.275
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Merryn Constable, Tiffany Lung, John de Grosbois, Luc Tremblay, Jay Pratt, Timothy Welsh; Is the motor contagion effect an artifact of eye movements?. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):275. doi: 10.1167/16.12.275.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The 'motor contagion' effect manifests when a participant performs one action while simultaneously observing an action performed by another person; observing an incongruent action relative to a congruent action results in an increase in spatial displacement along the orthogonal plane to the participant's intended movement. Motor contagion is often cited as an example of motor interference produced by the activation of motor neurons associated with the observed action that compete with the target action. In the typical motor contagion paradigm, little attention has been given to the complexities of how an individual's eye movement may influence action execution. Indeed, experimenters often instruct their participants to follow the hand of the actor with their eyes while completing the task. It is well known that hands follow eyes; therefore, this instruction could have a large impact on the way motor 'contagion' manifests. Thus, we investigated if concurrently executed eye movements could explain the motor contagion effect. Participants made horizontal arm movements while observing an actor making either vertical (incongruent) or horizontal (congruent) movements under three conditions: no instruction, instruction to maintain fixation on a central cross, or instruction to follow the actor's hand with their eyes. The eye and hand movements of the participants were recorded. Movement variability in the secondary axis was larger in the incongruent than congruent movement conditions only in the 'follow' condition. These data indicate that motor contagion-like effects may be an artifact of simultaneously executed eye movements. We conclude that, at least in this case, an actor's actions are not 'contagious' unless the participant has an existing propensity to follow an actor's actions with their eyes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×