August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Biological motion distorts size perception
Author Affiliations
  • Peter Veto
    Philipps-University Marburg, Neurophysics
  • Wolfgang Einhäuser
    Philipps-University Marburg, Neurophysics
  • Nikolaus Troje
    Queen's University Kingston, Department of Psychology
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 282. doi:10.1167/16.12.282
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Peter Veto, Wolfgang Einhäuser, Nikolaus Troje; Biological motion distorts size perception. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):282. doi: 10.1167/16.12.282.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Size perception is distorted in several illusions, including some that rely on complex social attributes: for example, people of higher subjective importance are associated with larger size. Biological motion receives preferential visual processing over non-biological motion with similar low-level properties, a difference presumably related to a stimulus' ecological importance. Hence, we asked whether biological motion perception can also lead to size illusions. In each trial, observers (N=16) were simultaneously exposed to an upright and an inverted point-light walker from a frontal view for 250 ms. After disappearance of the walkers, two circles were flashed at their positions. The circles differed in size to varying degrees, and observers were queried to indicate with a non-speeded button press, which of the circles appeared larger. We conducted paired sample t-tests on the parameters of the psychometric curves fitted to response frequencies for upright versus inverted cued targets. We found that the circle at the location of the upright walker was perceived smaller than the circle at the location of the inverted walker (t(15) = 2.37, p < .05). Our findings introduce a novel illusion: biological motion reduces subsequently perceived size relative to non-biological motion.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×