August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Working Memory Capacity Predicts Two Causes of Increased Accuracy in Visual Search
Author Affiliations
  • Chad Peltier
    Michigan State University
  • Mark Becker
    Michigan State University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 344. doi:10.1167/16.12.344
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chad Peltier, Mark Becker; Working Memory Capacity Predicts Two Causes of Increased Accuracy in Visual Search. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):344. doi: 10.1167/16.12.344.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

There are two potential causes of missed targets in visual search tasks: search errors, where the target is never inspected before making a response, and recognition errors, where the target is fixated, but goes unrecognized. Search errors increase with low quitting thresholds; too few items are inspected to reliably find the target. Recognition errors are due to a poor decision process that evaluates whether each scrutinized item is a target or not (and could be due to a conservative criterion, poor evidence accumulation, or a poor search template), resulting in a greater chance of the item failing to reach the target threshold (Wolfe & Van Wert, 2010). Though high working memory has been found to predict greater accuracy in visual search tasks (Schwark, Sandry, & Dolgov, 2013), it is unknown whether the source of this improvement is higher quitting thresholds, better item-by-item decisions, or both. To investigate this issue, eye movements were tracked during a visual search task for a target T among Ls. Following eye-tracking, working memory capacity (WMC) was measured using a change detection task (Luck and Vogel, 1997). We correlated WMC with accuracy, number of items inspected before terminating a trial, and target recognition rate in the visual search task. Results show that working memory is positively correlated with hit rate, replicating previous research. We extend these results by showing higher working memory predicts both an increase in the number of items inspected per trial and a decrease in recognition errors, indicating higher quitting thresholds and better item-by-item decision making. These results could potentially be used to inform screening of new employees whose jobs will be to detect targets in a visual search, such as in the Transportation Security Administration.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×