August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
The half-time groove of divided attention: differences in EEG and decoding power spectra when attending to one vs. two items
Author Affiliations
  • Sabastien Crouzet
    Université de Toulouse, France
  • Rufin VanRullen
    Université de Toulouse, France
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 584. doi:10.1167/16.12.584
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sabastien Crouzet, Rufin VanRullen; The half-time groove of divided attention: differences in EEG and decoding power spectra when attending to one vs. two items. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):584. doi: 10.1167/16.12.584.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Recent research indicates that sustained attention could in fact process information rhythmically, as a sequence of successive cycles with its own intrinsic frequency. When two items must be attended, an intriguing corollary of this "blinking spotlight" notion could be that the successive cycles are directed alternately to each target; as a result, each item would effectively be sampled at half the intrinsic rate of attention. Here, we tested this prediction in two experiments. In an endogenous attention task, subjects (n=8) covertly monitored one or two peripheral images (one house, one face) in order to detect a brief contrast change. In the sustained occipital EEG power, attending to two vs. one item resulted in a relative increase around 4Hz and a relative decrease around 10-11Hz. In a second experiment, we tested if comparable oscillations could be observed in the stimulus-evoked EEG visual representational content. Subjects (n=9) saw a first peripheral image (house or face) displayed alone for 600ms, before a second one (face or house) also appeared for the same duration, but at a different peripheral location. In monkeys, a similar protocol was found to trigger low-frequency 5Hz oscillations in inferotemporal single-cell activity, reflecting competitive interactions between neural populations selective to the two objects (Rollenhagen & Olson, 2005). Using time-resolved MVPA on EEG evoked-responses, we were able to create item selective classifiers that constantly indicated which stimulus was on the screen (peak AUC=0.8 around 100 ms after image onset). The time-course of single-trial classifier decision values presented a relative peak around 11Hz when only one object was present, and around 4-5Hz when two objects were on the screen. Taken together, these results are compatible with a blinking spotlight of attention, sampling information periodically around 10-11Hz, and resulting in a half-frequency effective sampling (around 4-5Hz) when there are two items to attend.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×