August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Attentional deployment during feature and conjunction searches
Author Affiliations
  • Laura Dugue
    Department of Psychology, NYU
  • Alice Xue
    Stuyvesant High School, NYC
  • Marisa Carrasco
    Department of Psychology, NYU
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 749. doi:10.1167/16.12.749
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Laura Dugue, Alice Xue, Marisa Carrasco; Attentional deployment during feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):749. doi: 10.1167/16.12.749.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Background. Feature and conjunction search tasks are widely used to study attentional deployment in space and in time. However, the spatiotemporal behavior of attention in these tasks remains under debate. Are multiple search stimuli processed in parallel or sequentially? Does this differ between these two types of search? If so, how? We used an innovative methodology to estimate the distribution of attention on a single trial basis for feature and conjunction search. Methods. Observers (n=8) performed feature and conjunction search tasks during separate sessions. They had to detect and discriminate a tilted low spatial-frequency grating among 3 similar looking distractors (i.e., vertical gratings in feature, and vertical or high spatial-frequency tilted gratings in conjunction search). After a variable delay, two additional probes (Landolt C's) were flashed at random locations. Performance in reporting the probes was used to infer attention deployment to those locations. Using the approach developed by Dugué et al. (PNAS 2015), we determined the probability of probe report at the most (P1) and least (P2) attended locations on a given trial. Were P1 and P2 equal, we would conclude that attention was uniformly distributed across the four locations occupied by the search stimuli. Otherwise, we would conclude that attention was non-uniformly distributed across the four locations. Results/Interpretations. Our results show that, for both feature and conjunction search, attention was non-uniformly distributed across the four locations. These results rule out a strict parallel/uniform model of attention processing during both the feature and conjunction search tasks. Interestingly, attentional distribution over time depended on the location of the probed stimuli in the visual field. This suggests that attentional distribution is heterogeneous across isoeccentric locations in a manner resembling asymmetries in visual performance at these locations.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×