August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Foveal centre surround contrast suppression reveals differential effect of ageing on binocular and interocular suppression
Author Affiliations
  • Kabilan Pitchaimuthu
    Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
  • Bao Nguyen
    Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
  • Allison McKendrick
    Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 783. doi:10.1167/16.12.783
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kabilan Pitchaimuthu, Bao Nguyen, Allison McKendrick; Foveal centre surround contrast suppression reveals differential effect of ageing on binocular and interocular suppression . Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):783. doi: 10.1167/16.12.783.

      Download citation file:


      © 2017 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology.

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Healthy ageing alters foveal surround suppression of apparent contrast (FSSAC). The neural basis of FSSAC is considered to reflect several V1 neuronal receptive field properties. Primate V1 neurons have distinct transient/sustained (Bair et al, 2003) and early/late (Webb et al, 2005) surround suppression mechanisms. Here, we tested whether similar properties are manifest for FSSAC and if so, are they altered by ageing? We measured the apparent contrast of a centre circular vertically oriented sinusoid (20% contrast, 4c/deg) alone or in the presence of an annular sinusoidal surround (40% contrast, 4c/deg) present foveally. Nineteen younger (aged 19-32) and 19 older (aged 61-78) adults were tested under two viewing conditions (binocular: centre and surround in both eyes; interocular: centre and surround in different eyes), two surround configurations (No/Parallel surround) and two stimulus durations (40ms/200ms). Suppression strength was calculated as Apparent ContrastNo Surround — Apparent ContrastParallel Surround. In both groups, using binocular viewing, stimulus durations of 40ms produced stronger suppression than 200ms, however, both stimulus durations produced similar amounts of suppression interocularly (stimulus duration X viewing condition: F(1,36)=7.19,P=0.01). This suggests that binocular FSSAC has increased surround adaptation for longer duration stimuli, but not the interocular FSSAC. For both stimulus durations, older adults showed increased binocular suppression relative to the younger group, however, interocular suppression was similar (age X viewing condition: F(1,36)=7.94,P< 0.01, age X stimulus duration: F(1,36)=0.04,P=0.84). Our data suggests that ageing alters surround suppression at a processing stage before binocular combination of visual signals, either prior to or including the input layers of V1.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×