August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Audiovisual "Illusory Rabbit": The Role of Postdiction in Crossmodal Spatiotemporal Dynamics
Author Affiliations
  • Shinsuke Shimojo
    Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology
  • Noelle Stiles
    Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology
  • Monica Li
    Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology
  • Carmel Levitan
    Psychology, Occidental College
  • Yukiyasu Kamitani
    Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 869. doi:10.1167/16.12.869
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Shinsuke Shimojo, Noelle Stiles, Monica Li, Carmel Levitan, Yukiyasu Kamitani; Audiovisual "Illusory Rabbit": The Role of Postdiction in Crossmodal Spatiotemporal Dynamics. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):869. doi: 10.1167/16.12.869.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Background: The temporal paradox of stimuli following an event affecting that event's perception (postdiction), provides a unique window into brain processing (Shimojo, fpsyg 2014). This study revisits the audiovisual rabbit illusion (Kamitani & Shimojo, VSS 2001) and examines whether audition can modify visual perception postdictively. Methods: A sequence of flashes (13 ms each, total stimulus duration 145(?) ms) was presented on a computer monitor moving left-to-right, while accompanying beeps (7 ms each) were communicated on a single left-hand-side speaker. Stimuli included: two lone flashes (2F0B), two flash-beep pairs (2F2B) and two flashes and three beeps, with the two flashes accompanying the first and the third beeps, respectively (2F3B). Subjects reported the number of flashes perceived (Expt. 1), or both the number of flashes and the location of the flashes (Expt. 2). Results: Expt 1: Participants (N = 8) perceived significantly more flashes with 2F3B than 2F2B (p < 10-33), indicating the perception of an illusory flash in the 2F3B condition. Expt 2: The second flash (of three reported flashes) location in the 2F3B condition was midway between the first and third flash, indicating the illusory flash's location is postdictively determined. Discussion: The illusory flash following the first flash was perceived to be moved laterally in space toward the final flash location. This mid-location of the illusory flash must be determined after its perception, as no spatial movement is conveyed before or during its presentation. It indicates that the location of the illusory flash can be postdictively modified, and further that postdictive processing extends to crossmodal interactions.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×