August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
A viewing time account for robust spatial cueing effects in all attentional paradigms
Author Affiliations
  • Christie Haskell
    Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • Britt Anderson
    Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 906. doi:10.1167/16.12.906
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christie Haskell, Britt Anderson; A viewing time account for robust spatial cueing effects in all attentional paradigms. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):906. doi: 10.1167/16.12.906.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Both predictive spatial cues and leptokurtic reward distributions may lead to increased response precision. Is this because of changes in the efficiency with which sensory information is evaluated at prioritized locations? Such an account would be consistent with attentional theories that emphasize noise exclusion and reductions in sensory uncertainty. To distinguish cue and reward effects on perceptual efficiencies from other attentional effects we devised a gaze contingent paradigm where we could equate stimulus viewing time across cue and reward conditions. We had participants report the orientation of Gabors presented in the periphery at contrasts too low for orientation to be reliably reported without fixation. Participants were instructed to look at the Gabor as quickly as possible and then report its orientation. By tracking a participant's gaze, we were able to limit Gabor fixation time to a standard 60ms across cue and reward conditions. Spatial cues appeared on 80% of trials and predicted the location of the Gabor with 50% validity. Reward conditions were either leptokurtic (peaked) for a block of 250 trials followed by a platykurtic (flat) reward block or a platykurtic block followed by a leptokurtic reward block. For one third of participants they began with a no reward condition followed by leptokurtic rewards. With a fixed viewing time there was no effect of any cue or reward condition on response precision. However, fixation response times were consistently faster for validly cued trials and pupil diameter was greatest for leptokurtic rewards. Thus, we conclude that the robust spatial cueing effects seen in essentially all attentional paradigms reflect additional viewing time that succeeds a valid cue when the stimulus is presented for a fixed duration or the viewing time is terminated by the participant's response.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×