August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
Humans integrate both speed and elapsed time cues for object interception
Author Affiliations
  • Chia-Jung Chang
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, MIT
  • Mehrdad Jazayeri
    Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, MIT
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 971. doi:10.1167/16.12.971
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chia-Jung Chang, Mehrdad Jazayeri; Humans integrate both speed and elapsed time cues for object interception. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):971. doi: 10.1167/16.12.971.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

To intercept a moving object, the brain must compute a reliable estimate of time-to-contact (TTC), which can be inferred from measurements of speed, elapsed time and position. Since these variables are physically interrelated, it is challenging to tease apart the sensory cues that guide this behavior. Previous studies have shown that humans rely on speed estimation and distance to compute TTC. However, given the brain's capacity to measure interval timing independent of speed, it is conceivable that humans utilize an estimate of elapsed time to further improve their performance. To test this possibility, we asked subjects to press a button when an initially visible moving object would arrive at a designated target location behind an occluder. We found that their TTC estimation had the lowest mean squared error when the visible and occluded regions had the same length and duration, suggesting that subjects might additionally use a measure of elapsed time to compute TTC. To test the hypothesis more directly, we modified the object interception task to dissociate speed and timing information. The speed cue was provided by a brief visible region at the beginning of the trial, whereas the timing cue was provided by a flash bisecting the actual TTC. When the cues were presented separately, a Bayesian model integrating prior distribution with relevant sensory measurement accounted for performance. When both cues were available, performance improved beyond what could be attributed to either time or speed measurement alone, suggesting that subjects combined both speed (from the visible region) and elapsed time (from the flash) cues to estimate TTC. An additional cue conflict paradigm further substantiated the evidence that subjects integrate both speed and elapsed time to optimize their performance. These findings suggest that the brain integrates signals associated with timing and speed to control motor responses during object interception.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×