August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
The size congruity effect in visual search for digits involves both facilitation and interference
Author Affiliations
  • Amrita Puri
    Department of Psychology, Illinois State University
  • Kenith Sobel
    Department of Psychology and Counseling, University of Central Arkansas
  • Nikolas Sieg
    Department of Psychology and Counseling, University of Central Arkansas
  • Zachery Stillman
    Department of Psychology, Illinois State University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 993. doi:10.1167/16.12.993
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amrita Puri, Kenith Sobel, Nikolas Sieg, Zachery Stillman; The size congruity effect in visual search for digits involves both facilitation and interference . Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):993. doi: 10.1167/16.12.993.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Consistent with the size congruity effect (SCE) reported in digit comparison tasks (Henik & Tzelgov, 1982) and findings that semantic meaning influences visual search for digits (Sobel et al., 2015), a recent report suggests that searching for numerically large or small digits among distractors that differ from the target in both numerical and physical size is faster when numerical and physical size are congruent compared to when they are incongruent (Sobel & Puri, 2014). We investigated whether the SCE in visual search is due to interference between semantic and perceptual information on incongruent trials, facilitation of search on congruent trials, or both. Participants searched for three-digit target numbers that were either less than 500 (numerically small) or greater than 500 (numerically large) within displays containing four, six, or eight distractors. Targets could also be physically small among medium and large distractors, medium among small and large distractors, or large among small and medium distractors. Thus, on congruent trials, targets were either numerically and physically large or numerically and physically small, and on incongruent trials, targets were either numerically large but physically small or numerically small but physically large. Furthermore, a third set of trials involved congruence-neutral targets, which were numerically small or numerically large but physically medium, presented among physically large and physically small distractors. All conditions were within subjects, with numerically large vs. numerically small targets presented in blocks, and congruent, incongruent, and neutral trials randomly interleaved. Participants reported whether targets were on the left or right of the display. A main effect of congruence on reaction times was due to faster RTs in the congruent conditions and slower RTs in the incongruent conditions compared to the neutral conditions, suggesting both facilitation on congruent trials and interference on incongruent trials.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×