Purchase this article with an account.
Jared Peterson, Ryan Ringer, Michele Riter, Elizabeth Sisco, Maria De La Torre, Shobha Subedi, Lester Loschky; The Effects of Blur/Clarity Contrast on Visual Selective Attention. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):994. doi: 10.1167/16.12.994.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
The detection of visual blur during a dual task has been shown to be unaffected by cognitive load (Loschky et al., 2014). Blur may be a feature that can be detected preattentively, such as color, orientation, etc. (Treisman & Gelade, 1980). Interestingly, eyetracking studies have shown when blur/clarity contrast is present in a scene, eye movements during free viewing tend to go to regions of clarity rather than blur (Enns & MacDonald, 2012; Kahn, Dinet, & Konik, 2011; Loschky & McConkie, 2002; Smith & Tadmor, 2012). However, these issues have not been studied in the context of visual search, the "gold standard" of attentional selection research. Thus, an eyetracking visual search study investigated if blur/clarity contrast is non-predictive of a target, will unique blur capture or repel visual selective attention or be ignored? A legibility control study showed that identification accuracy and reaction times did not significantly differ between blurred or clear single rotated T-like Ls or Ts (Jiang & Chun, 2001); thus legibility would not explain search results. Then, a rotated L versus T visual search task was performed with an imaginary circle of eight degrees radius, and set sizes 4 & 8, using the control study stimuli. Letters were presented either all-blurred, all-clear, or with a blurred or clear singleton letter among distractors. With set size 4, reaction times weakly supported unique blur being ignored (blurred singleton target = all-blurred). With set size 8, reaction times strongly supported unique blur being ignored (blurred singleton target = all-blurred = all-clear) and clarity captured visual selective attention (clear singleton target all-clear & blurred singleton target). Eyetracking results further supported these conclusions. In set size 8, the first eye movement to a letter most frequently landed on a uniquely clear letter, but not uniquely blurred letters. Overall, the results suggest that unique clarity captures attention while unique blur is ignored.
Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only