August 2016
Volume 16, Issue 12
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   September 2016
A systematic search strategy in radiology: seeing more, missing less?
Author Affiliations
  • Ellen Kok
    School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University
  • Halszka Jarodzka
    Welten Institute � Research Centre for Learning, Teaching and Technology, Open University of The Netherlands
  • Anique de Bruin
    School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University
  • Hussain BinAmir
    International Master in Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Simon Robben
    Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre
  • Jeroen van Merri�nboer
    School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University
Journal of Vision September 2016, Vol.16, 1334. doi:10.1167/16.12.1334
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Ellen Kok, Halszka Jarodzka, Anique de Bruin, Hussain BinAmir, Simon Robben, Jeroen van Merri�nboer; A systematic search strategy in radiology: seeing more, missing less?. Journal of Vision 2016;16(12):1334. doi: 10.1167/16.12.1334.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Diagnosing chest radiographs is a complex task that is difficult to master for medical students. Many textbooks in radiology thus recommend a systematic search strategy for detecting abnormalities in a radiograph. This systematic search strategy entails that anatomic regions are always inspected in the same order over radiographs. This is expected to lead to a complete coverage of the radiograph, and by that it should lead to a lower number of missed abnormalities. There is, however, very little evidence for the recommendation to use a systematic search strategy. We therefore investigated the assumed relationship between systematic search, coverage and number of misses, as well as the effect of training on these variables. Seventy-five 2nd year medical students underwent training in a systematic, a full-coverage (no focus on systematicity) or a non-systematic search strategy. Eye tracking was used to investigate the amount of systematic search (using Levenshtein Distance) and average percentage coverage of images. A more systematic search (lower Levenshtein Distance) was correlated with increased coverage, r = -.35, p < .01. Neither Levenshtein distance nor coverage were related with number of misses (respectively, r =.05, p =.73 and r = -.13, p =.31). Participants who underwent systematic search training were more systematic than the two other groups, K(2) = 16.58, p < .01. Participants in the systematic search group, and the full-coverage group covered more of the image than the non-systematic search group, K(2) = 7.42, p =.03. Participants in the full-coverage group missed most of the abnormalities, while the systematic-viewing group and non-systematic viewing group did not differ significantly F(2, 71) = 3.95, p =.02. The eye tracking data show that the training influenced viewing behaviour as predicted. However, performance did not increase with increased coverage. The data question the effectiveness of teaching students to systematically search a radiograph.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2016

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×