September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Dynamic differences in letter contrast polarity improve peripheral letter string and word recognition performance
Author Affiliations
  • Jean-Baptiste Bernard
    Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS, UMR 7290, Aix-Marseille Université
  • Eric Castet
    Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS, UMR 7290, Aix-Marseille Université
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 27. doi:10.1167/17.10.27
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jean-Baptiste Bernard, Eric Castet; Dynamic differences in letter contrast polarity improve peripheral letter string and word recognition performance. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):27. doi: 10.1167/17.10.27.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Letter crowding (the inability to identify a letter when surrounded by other letters) is reduced when target and flankers are dissimilar. This release is particularly strong when target and flankers have different contrast polarities (Kooi et al, 1994), but peripheral word recognition does not benefit from this release because observers need to simultaneously report target and flankers of different contrasts (Chung et al, 2010). Here, we investigate if the sequential uncrowding of successive letters using a dynamic contrast polarity difference could improve peripheral letter string and word recognition performance. Three subjects participated in two experiments with letters presented horizontally at 10° in the lower visual field in white or black on a gray background (same absolute contrast value) while eye position was controlled. Subjects identified trigrams (Experiment 1) and 5-letter words (Experiment 2) using three different displays (4 blocks of 50 trials for each experiment and each display): (a) Basic display (Black letters), (b) Static contrast polarity variation (SCPV) display (letters with static alternate contrast polarity) and (c) Dynamic contrast polarity variation (DCPV) display (each letter successively changing from black to white for 200 ms from left to right). Presentation duration was 800 ms in Experiment 1, and depended on subjects in Experiment 2 (3.54±1.26 s). Letter print-size was adjusted so that letter recognition rate was at 50% for the basic display in Experiment 1. For each subject, results for Experiments 1 and 2 show the best recognition rate for the DCPV display (average: 64±4% (Exp1) and 72±5% (Exp2)) compared to the SCPV (40±2% (Exp1) and 57±3% (Exp2)) and basic (42±3% (Exp1) and 49±6% (Exp2)) displays. These results suggest that peripheral letter string and word recognition can be improved using letter contrast polarity differences if word letters are successively uncrowded.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×