September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Resource scarcity impairs visual online detection and prospective memory
Author Affiliations
  • Brandon Tomm
    Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia
  • Jiaying Zhao
    Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia
    Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 99. doi:10.1167/17.10.99
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Brandon Tomm, Jiaying Zhao; Resource scarcity impairs visual online detection and prospective memory. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):99. doi: 10.1167/17.10.99.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Operating under limited resources (e.g., money, time) poses significant demands on the cognitive system. Scarcity induces attentional trade-offs of information in the environment, which can impact memory encoding. In three experiments (N=227) we demonstrate that people under time scarcity failed to detect time-saving cues as they occur in the environment, suggesting that scarcity impairs the ability to detect online cues. These time-saving cues, if noticed, would have saved more time for the time poor participants, alleviating the condition of scarcity. A follow-up experiment showed that the visuospatial proximity of the time-saving cues to the focal task determined successful detection of the time-saving cues, suggesting that the online detection errors can be explained by spatial attention on the task at hand. Thus, time scarcity may cause attentional trade-offs whereby attention is focused on the task at hand, while ironically, other beneficial information is neglected as it occurs in the environment. We also demonstrate that people under time scarcity were more likely to forget previous instructions to execute future actions, suggesting that scarcity causes prospective memory errors. Ironically, the time poor participants failed to remember previous instructions which, if followed, would have saved them time. These experiments show that scarcity impairs the online detection of beneficial information in the environment, as well as the execution of prospective memory cues. Failures of prospective memory and online detection are particularly problematic because they cause forgetting and neglect of beneficial information, perpetuating the condition of scarcity. The current studies provide a new cognitive account for the counterproductive behaviors in individuals under resource scarcity, and have implications for interventions to reduce neglect and forgetting in the poor.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×