September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Face repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque middle lateral face patch.
Author Affiliations
  • Kasper Vinken
    Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven
    Laboratory of Biological Psychology, KU Leuven
  • Hans Op de Beeck
    Laboratory of Biological Psychology, KU Leuven
  • Rufin Vogels
    Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 257. doi:10.1167/17.10.257
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kasper Vinken, Hans Op de Beeck, Rufin Vogels; Face repetition probability does not affect repetition suppression in macaque middle lateral face patch.. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):257. doi: 10.1167/17.10.257.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

It has been proposed that repetition suppression (i.e. a reduced neural activity when stimuli are repeated) results from a fulfilled expectation of repetition or a reduced prediction error (Summerfield et al., 2008). This implies that repetition suppression should increase when a repetition is expected and decrease when it is unexpected. While this prediction is supported by human functional imaging (fMRI) studies (e.g. Summerfield et al., 2008), no evidence was found in macaque inferior temporal cortex (IT) spiking activity (Kaliukhovich & Vogels, 2011). Here, we tested three possible explanations for this discrepancy by recording spiking activity in macaque IT. First, we performed recordings in face patch ML instead of outside of a face-selective region. Second, we used faces as stimuli. Third, we required our monkeys to perform a task instead of passive fixation. In two experiments, we manipulated the probability of a face repetition (75% or 25%) between blocks of 40 trials. A trial consisted of two face presentations that were either a repetition (same face identity) or an alternation, followed by a saccade response by the monkey to receive a reward. In a first experiment, we included target trials where one face was inverted. The task (did the trial contain an inverted face?) was orthogonal to the manipulation of repetition probability. We observed repetition suppression, but there was no effect of repetition probability on its magnitude (face-selective cells in 2 monkeys). In a further experiment, we made a face repetition relevant to the task (i.e. was the face repeated?). There was a clear performance bias dependent on the probability of a face repetition, but again no effect on the responses (face-selective cells in 1 monkey). In conclusion, regardless of whether a face repetition is explicitly relevant for the monkey, we see no evidence of a prediction error response in ML.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×