September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Perception of Depth in Natural Scenes
Author Affiliations
  • Yiran Duan
    Department of Psychology, Stanford University
  • Alexandra Yakovleva
    Department of Psychology, Stanford University
  • Anthony Norcia
    Department of Psychology, Stanford University
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 329. doi:10.1167/17.10.329
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Yiran Duan, Alexandra Yakovleva, Anthony Norcia; Perception of Depth in Natural Scenes. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):329. doi: 10.1167/17.10.329.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

The role of disparity in depth perception has typically been studied using random-dot stereograms because they contain no monocular clues, thus isolating the responses to "pure disparity". Pure disparity rarely exists in the real world. Rather, disparity occurs in the context of several monocular depth cues. To study disparity processing in natural scenes, we compared visually evoked responses to 2D and 3D versions of the same scene that differed only in their disparity structure. Thirty natural scenes were drawn from a large set of natural image stereo-pairs (Burge et al., 2016 J. Vis) to ensure diversity of scene types and depth maps. The scenes mainly included outdoor settings with trees and buildings. Nineteen subjects (Mean age = 22.9, 8 males) viewed a sequential two-alternative temporal forced choice presentation of two different versions of the same scene (2D vs. 3D) interleaved by a scrambled image with the same power spectrum (4 images per trial, 750 ms each). Scenes were viewed orthostereoscopically at 3 meters through a pair of shutter glasses. After each trial, participants indicated with a key press which version of the scene was 3D. Performance on the discrimination was >90%. We compared 128 channel Visual Evoked Potentials elicited by 2D and 3D scenes using Reliable Component Analysis (Dmochowski Greaves and Norcia, 2015). Both scene types elicited responses with onset times of ~180 msec. The differential response between 2D and 3D scenes was maximal on mid-line electrodes over the occipital pole. Significant differences between responses to 2D and 3D scenes first emerged at around 200 msec. This suggests that approximately 20 additional msec are needed for the brain to begin the extraction of 3D structure from the disparity cues in natural scenes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×