September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Factors that do and don't make flashing faces more distorted
Author Affiliations
  • Hannah Pearson
    Psychology Department, North Dakota State University
  • Benjamin Balas
    Psychology Department, North Dakota State University
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 1025. doi:10.1167/17.10.1025
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hannah Pearson, Benjamin Balas; Factors that do and don't make flashing faces more distorted. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):1025. doi: 10.1167/17.10.1025.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Normal faces rapidly presented in the visual peripher are perceived as grotesque and distorted (Tangen, Murphy, Thompson, 2011). This phenomenon, "The flashed-face distortion effect" (FFD) is a powerful illusion that reveals important properties of how faces are coded in peripheral vision. Presently, we manipulated aspects of facial appearance and spatial/temporal properties of the flashed-face stimulus to determine what factors modulate the illusion's strength. In our first study, we examined how face orientation (upright vs. inverted), makeup, and image size each affected FFD strength. Face inversion was intended as a means of determining the illusion's face-specificity, while varying makeup and image size was intended to reveal how local contrast and spatial scale impacted the FFD. We recruited 28 participants to complete two experimental blocks: One in which makeup and orientation were varied across trials, and another in which makeup and image size (at a fixed eccentricity) were varied. Participants rated apparent distortion using a 1-7 scale. We found that neither the presence of makeup nor face orientation impacted the FFD, but image size did. Specifically, faces presented at an intermediate size (~4 degrees of visual angle) were rated as more distorted than smaller or larger faces (p=0.003). In our second study, we examined how perceived distortion was impacted by makeup and both the eccentricity and duration of the images comprising the FFD sequences. Briefly, we again found no impact of makeup on the FFD, but did find that both longer image durations (p< 0.001) and greater eccentricities (p< 0.001) led to significantly more distortion. These results suggest that the FFD is not a face-specific effect, but instead depends on low-level spatial and temporal factors. The FFD may thus reflect the dynamics of pooling operations in the visual periphery and should be observable with other object classes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×