September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
The primacy effect in primate saccade target selection
Author Affiliations
  • Jeroen Goossens
    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
  • Joke Kalisvaart
    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
  • Roohollah Massoudi
    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
  • Peter Bremen
    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 1168. doi:10.1167/17.10.1168
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jeroen Goossens, Joke Kalisvaart, Roohollah Massoudi, Peter Bremen; The primacy effect in primate saccade target selection. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):1168. doi: 10.1167/17.10.1168.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

It is often assumed that decision-making involves neural competition, accumulation of evidence 'scores' over time, and commitment to a choice once its 'scores' reach decision-threshold first. So far, however, neither the first-to-threshold rule, nor the nature of competition, has been revealed by experiments. Here, we presented two simultaneously-flashed targets that reversed their intensity difference during presentation, and instructed subjects to saccade towards the brightest target. Both humans (n=6) and monkeys (n=2) preferentially chose the target that was brightest during the first stimulus phase. Unless this first phase was too short, primacy persisted even if the second, reversed-intensity phase lasted longer. This effect did not result from premature commitment to the initially-dominant target; a strong target imbalance in the opposite direction later on drove nearly all responses towards that location. Moreover, there was a non-monotonic relation between primacy and target imbalance; increasing this imbalance beyond 40 cd/m2 caused an attenuation of primacy.These are the hallmarks of hysteresis, predicted by models in which target-representations compete through strong feedback. Preliminary analysis indicates that the choice behavior is reflected in the timing of visual burst activity of neurons in the Frontal Eye Field; bursts for 'winning' target-representations preceded the 'losing' ones. However, the contrast-dependent changes in burst timing did not result from cross-inhibition; keeping the intensity of the target inside the receptive field of the cell constant while changing the intensity of the opponent target, abolished the latency changes.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×