September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Explaining 'crispening' as a gain control mechanism.
Author Affiliations
  • David Kane
    Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 1184. doi:10.1167/17.10.1184
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      David Kane, Marcelo Bertalmío; Explaining 'crispening' as a gain control mechanism.. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):1184. doi: 10.1167/17.10.1184.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

Sensitivity to variations in luminance has been extensively studied via detection thresholds to give the well-known threshold versus intensity (TvI) function. The function is expansive – the lower the luminance level, the lower the threshold. However, when a pedestal is introduced such that the task is to discriminate between the luminance of two patches superimposed upon a uniform background, the results are substantially more complex. Thresholds are both low at the lowest luminance levels tested and additionally around the background luminance level, an effect termed 'crispening'. This has lead authors to propose two separate mechanisms, one more sensitive to low luminance levels and another to contrast around the background luminance level. In this paper, we model discrimination thresholds via a single mechanism. We assume that the maximal sensitivity of the HVS is well modeled by the shape of the TvI function, but in the case of non-uniform backgrounds this function is modulated by a gain control mechanism that increases thresholds away from the background luminance level. We evaluate our model upon the data of Paul Whittle (1986) who examined discrimination threshold over a broad luminance range and also upon new and old data for functions exhibiting various levels of 'crispening' (Nagy and Kamholz, 1995). Second, in keeping with the work of Paul Whittle (1992) we investigate whether this model can predict supra-threshold brightness functions. We find that as long as a realistic (a non-Weber) TvI function is used, that the brightness functions can be accurately estimated. In the case of non-uniform backgrounds (salt and pepper noise or the inclusion of an annulus), the model requires an additional gain term for each background luminance level. Although this adds to the complexity of the model, it offers the possibility of extending the model to arbitrarily complex stimuli.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×