September 2017
Volume 17, Issue 10
Open Access
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2017
Fusion breaks at extreme eye positions due to lack of adaptation in the vergence system
Author Affiliations
  • Elizabeth Fast
    University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology
  • Linus Holm
    Umeå University, Department of Psychology
  • Linda McLoon
    University of Minnesota, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Neurosciences
  • Stephen Engel
    University of Minnesota, Department of Psychology
Journal of Vision August 2017, Vol.17, 1155. doi:10.1167/17.10.1155
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      ×
      This feature is available to Subscribers Only
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth Fast, Linus Holm, Linda McLoon, Stephen Engel; Fusion breaks at extreme eye positions due to lack of adaptation in the vergence system. Journal of Vision 2017;17(10):1155. doi: 10.1167/17.10.1155.

      Download citation file:


      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

      ×
  • Supplements
Abstract

What limits our ability to diverge or converge our eyes? Current models suggest that vergence depends upon a slow, adaptable tonic component that determines the "baseline" position of our eyes, and a fast fusional component activated primarily by retinal disparity, which drives additional vergence. This framework predicts that as images require larger vergence movements to stay binocularly fused, putting the eyes in relatively extreme positions, fusion should break only if adaptation cannot maintain high enough baselines. We tested this prediction by adapting the vergence systems of 8 subjects to sequential increases of 2° image disparity, which produced divergent eye movements. Beginning at 3°, subjects adapted for 5 min blocks, before disparity increased further, to a maximum of 15°. Subjects viewed an image of an outdoor scene, while relative eye position was measured with an eye tracker and a behavioral measure. To estimate adaptation of the baseline component we measured phoria, the misalignment of the two eyes with no disparity present. Phoria should be small when adaptation is complete, and was measured every 30 s by replacing the image in one eye with a gray field for 10 s. Results showed evidence of vergence adaptation; phorias decreased on average within a block by 1.27° degrees. However, both eyetracking and behavioral estimates of adaptation became smaller across successive blocks (p < 0.01). One interpretation of these results is that adaptation became less complete as eye alignment became more extreme. Without complete adaptation of the tonic baseline, disparity became too large for the fast fusional component to overcome, and fusion broke. These results predict that longer viewing times could produce more complete adaptation, and allow vergence to reach previously unattainable positions, potentially beneficial for the treatment of strabismus.

Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2017

×
×

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.

×