December 2017
Volume 17, Issue 15
Open Access
OSA Fall Vision Meeting Abstract  |   December 2017
Different properties of training-induced visual recovery in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients
Author Affiliations
  • Elizabeth Saionz
    University of Rochester Medical Center
Journal of Vision December 2017, Vol.17, 30-31. doi:10.1167/17.15.30a
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Elizabeth Saionz; Different properties of training-induced visual recovery in sub-acute and chronic stroke patients. Journal of Vision 2017;17(15):30-31. doi: 10.1167/17.15.30a.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Stroke damage to V1 in adult humans causes cortical blindness (CB). We previously showed that visual discrimination training in chronic (>6 months) stroke patients decreases the deficit, but recovered vision remains impaired. Evidence in sensorimotor stroke suggests that earlier intervention promotes greater recovery. Here, we asked if visual discrimination training initiated sub-acutely (<3 months) after V1 stroke enhances improvement in CB. Ten sub-acute and 12 chronic CB patients trained with a global direction discrimination and integration task in their blind field. Three additional sub-acutes were tested but not trained, serving as controls. Initial discrimination performance was at chance (baseline normalized direction range [NDR] thresholds=100% for all subjects). After daily home training for 3 months, sub-acutes attained normal NDR thresholds (30 ± 14%) at trained locations much faster than chronics (sub-acutes: 11 ± 14 sessions; chronics: 99 ± 65 sessions; t(20)=4.18, p<0.001). Moreover, unlike chronics, whose recovery never transferred deeper into the blind field, trained sub-acutes exhibited transfer of recovery up to 10° deeper into the blind field than trained locations. Untrained sub-acutes had no spontaneous improvement in NDR, though all sub-acutes improved similarly on clinical Humphrey perimetry (luminance detection). Thus, discrimination training initiated in sub-acute CBs generates faster, more spatially distributed discrimination improvements than identical training in chronic CBs. While detection perimetry improved in both trained and untrained sub-acutes, only trained subjects recovered discrimination performance. In summary, without an intact V1, luminance detection may improve spontaneously during the sub-acute period, but deliberate training is required to recover visual discrimination abilities.


This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.