Abstract
Stimuli from one family of complex motions are defined by their spiral pitch, where cardinal axes represent signed expansion (pitch = 0° & 180°) and signed rotation (pitch = −90° & 90°). Intermediate spirals are represented by intermediate pitches. It is well established that vision contains mechanisms that sum over space and direction to detect these stimuli (Morrone et al, 1995, Nature, 376, 507–509; Harris & Meese, 1996, Perception, 25-supp, 129) and one intriguing possibility is that 4 cardinal mechanisms encode the entire family. We extended earlier work using a 2IFC technique and subthreshold summation to investigate this possibility. Subjects had to discriminate between random dot kinematograms constructed from ‘signal+noise’ in one interval and ‘noise’ alone in the other interval, where ‘signal’ comprised two components (A, B). Stimuli had a diameter of 5°, a duration of 300ms and contained 440 randomly positioned dots that traveled linearly through 10% of their distances from the origin. In the ‘noise’ interval, all dots had their directions randomized individually and in the ‘signal+noise’ interval, a staircase controlled the percentage of ‘signal’ dots. In Exp. 1, component A had a pitch of 0°, and in Exp. 2 it had a pitch of −45°. In both experiments, the pitch of component B was varied in 15° steps from 0° to 90° relative to the pitch of component A. Results were similar in both experiments with summation between the components decreasing as a function of pitch difference. Models contained mechanisms spaced at a pitch of either 90° (cardinal model) or 45° (spiral model). Probability summation was assumed between mechanisms and direction half-bandwidth (bw) was fit by the simplex algorithm. Although the cardinal model could account for the results of Exp. 1 (bw=69°), only the spiral model could account for the results of both exps. (bw=47°). We conclude that the detection of complex motion in human vision requires both cardinal and spiral mechanisms.