December 2001
Volume 1, Issue 3
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   December 2001
Does context influence a rival target's escape from suppression?
Author Affiliations
  • Kenith V. Sobel
    Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, USA
  • Randolph Blake
    Vanderbilt Vision Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN, USA
Journal of Vision December 2001, Vol.1, 173. doi:10.1167/1.3.173
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Kenith V. Sobel, Randolph Blake; Does context influence a rival target's escape from suppression?. Journal of Vision 2001;1(3):173. doi: 10.1167/1.3.173.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

PURPOSE Does binocular rivalry, the alternation in perceptual dominance associated with viewing incompatible monocular images, result from a single, omnibus process? As a point of departure for answering this question, we note that dominance phases among neighboring rival targets may covary when those targets imply global spatial structure, via common color, orientation, or motion. Local zones of rivalry seem to interact spatially to promote grouping and, therefore, global dominance. In our experiments, the global context outside of the region of rivalry was changed during rivalry, to learn whether contextual information alters the ability to detect changes in a suppressed target itself. METHODS One eye viewed an array of disks that appeared to be dimples because of implied shading. One member of this array was engaged in rivalry with a dissimilar target presented to the other eye. While suppressed, the rival dimple reversed contrast polarity on some trials but not on others, and the context dimples were sometimes reversed and sometimes not. RESULTS Reversals were detected only when they occurred rather abruptly; more gradual reversals went undetected. Contrary to expectation, contrast reversals outside the zone of rivalry did not enhance the ability to detect changes within the rivalry zone, but rather interfered. Evidently, the fate of the suppressed stimulus is determined by neural events distinct from those responsible for global organization during dominance. To reconcile diverse findings concerning rivalry, it may be important to distinguish between processes responsible for selection of one eye's input for dominance from processes responsible for the implementation and maintenance of suppression.

Sobel, K.V., Blake, R.(2001). Does context influence a rival target's escape from suppression? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 1( 3): 173, 173a,, doi:10.1167/1.3.173. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.