November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: Flanker orientation and location effects
Author Affiliations
  • Chien-Chung Chen
    The Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 217. doi:
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Chien-Chung Chen, Christopher W. Tyler; Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: Flanker orientation and location effects. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):217. doi:

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose. We showed that collinear flankers facilitate contrast discrimination at low contrasts but impede it at high (Chen & Tyler, 2001, Proc. Roy. Soc. B.). Physiological evidence suggests that the long range interaction is orientation and location specific. Thus, noncollinear flankers may have qualitatively different effects from collinear ones.

Methods. We measured contrast thresholds for vertical Gabor targets superimposed on a pedestal in the presence of flankers. All patterns were 4 c/deg Gabor patches. The pedestal orientation was vertical and the flankers were either vertical or horizontal, placed 1o from the target. “Aligned” flankers were placed in a vertical line, “side” flankers in a horizontal line through the target and “cross” flankers were the sum of the line and the side flankers.

Results. Without flankers, the target threshold vs. pedestal contrast (TvC) function showed a dipper shape: facilitation at low and masking at high contrast. The vertical line flankers increased both facilitation and masking effect. Compared with the vertical aligned flankers, the horizontal aligned flankers had less effect at low contrast, but had similar effect at high contrasts. The vertical side flankers had less effect at both low and high contrasts. The cross flankers had the same effect as the vertical aligned flankers, suggesting the flanker effects did not sum linearly across space.

Conclusions. We fit a sensitivity modulation model to the data. This model suggests that the target detector received multiplication inputs from other mechanisms in different hypercolumns that modulate its sensitivity to both excitatory and the divisive inhibitory elements of the response function. The best fit parameters reveal that there are two different long-range interactions: one is orientation and location specific and the other is broadly tuned.

Chen, C.-C., Tyler, C. W.(2002). Lateral modulation of contrast discrimination: Flanker orientation and location effects [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 217, 217a,, doi:10.1167/2.7.217. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.