November 2002
Volume 2, Issue 7
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   November 2002
Detection of second-order motion by a gradient-energy model
Author Affiliations
  • Christopher P. Benton
    University of Bristol, England
Journal of Vision November 2002, Vol.2, 656. doi:10.1167/2.7.656
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Christopher P. Benton; Detection of second-order motion by a gradient-energy model. Journal of Vision 2002;2(7):656. doi: 10.1167/2.7.656.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Central to research into second-order motion is the assumption that standard luminance based motion analysis cannot adequately detect direction of motion in second-order stimuli (unless some pre-processing non-linearity is applied). However recent work demonstrates that the information specifying direction of motion and/or velocity of second-order motion can potentially be accessed directly by luminance based motion mechanisms [1]. In the current study, a gradient-energy equivalent computational model [2] was applied to translating contrast modulations of static and dynamic binary noise. Models of this type can be divided into two stages of processing with a directionally selective stage preceding contrast normalisation. Directional indexes were calculated from model output at both stages. Directional index was defined as (|F| − |R|) / (|F| + |R|) where F is the vector sum of model outputs indicating motion in the direction of envelope motion and R is the vector sum of model outputs indicating reversed motion. The model robustly indicates the correct direction of motion for modulations of static noise at the contrast normalisation stage. Results at the opponent energy stage were more complex with the model occasionally signalling reversed motion (an effect largely dependent upon noise element size). Results for modulations of dynamic noise followed a similar pattern although the amplitude of the bias was considerably reduced. These findings demonstrate that direction of second-order motion can be extracted by a simple luminance based mechanism without the application of a pre-processing non-linearity. The successful recovery of second-order motion may well require operations beyond simple directional selectivity.

1) BentonC. P.JohnstonA.(2001). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, 2435– 2443.

2) AdelsonE.H.BergenJ.R.Proceedings from the workshop on motion: representation and analysis (pp 151–155). Charleston, SC, May 7–9 (1986).

Benton, C. P.(2002). Detection of second-order motion by a gradient-energy model [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2( 7): 656, 656a,, doi:10.1167/2.7.656. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.