Purchase this article with an account.
Barry B. Lee, Hao Sun, Walter Zucchini; The temporal properties of the response of macaque ganglion cells and central mechanisms of flicker detection. Journal of Vision 2007;7(14):1. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/7.14.1.
Download citation file:
© ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)
This analysis assesses sensitivity of primate ganglion cells to sinusoidal modulation as a function of temporal frequency, based on the structure of their impulse trains; sensitivity to luminance and chromatic modulation was compared to human psychophysical sensitivity to similar stimuli. Each stimulus cycle was Fourier analyzed, and response amplitudes subjected to neurometric analysis; this assumes a detector with duration inversely proportional to frequency, that is, the stimulus epoch analyzed is a single cycle rather than a fixed duration, and provides an upper bound for a detection by an observer who bases judgments on a single cell. Signal-to-noise ratio for a given Fourier amplitude rapidly decreased with temporal frequency. This is a consequence of the statistics of impulse trains making up the response; at higher temporal frequencies, there are fewer impulses per cycle. Performance of this “single-cell” observer was then compared with that of modeled central detection mechanisms of fixed duration. For chromatic modulation, a filter/detector with a time constant of ∼40 ms operating upon the parvocellular (PC) pathway provided a match to psychophysical results, whereas for luminance modulation, a filter/detection mechanism operating upon the magnocellular (MC) pathway with a time constant of ∼5–10 ms provided a suitable match. The effects of summation and nonlinear interactions between cell inputs to detection are also considered in terms of enhanced sensitivity and “sharpness” of thresholds, that is, the steepness of the neurometric function. For both luminance (MC cells) and chromatic modulation (PC cells), restricted convergence (<20 cells) appears adequate to provide sharp thresholds and sensitivity comparable to psychophysical performance.
This PDF is available to Subscribers Only