Objects moving in a cluttered environment are frequently occluded from view by other more nearby objects. Only fractions of an observed object may be simultaneously visible. In such situations, the perception of a moving integrated object relies on the ability to unite those fractions. This ability constitutes one of the most basic principles of perception; the gestalt law of common motion (Johansson,
1950). The component motions making up the global motion do not necessarily move in the same direction. Even when the components move orthogonally, they combine into a common motion of the whole group and the residual motions are perceived as relative motions within the group.
The sensitivity to global motion coherence develops very early in life. This has been demonstrated in three different ways. The first evidence comes from the habituation paradigm. Kellman and Spelke (
1983) showed that 4-month-old infants, who were habituated to a display consisting of a rod moving back and forth behind an occluder, dishabituated to the visible parts moving without the occluder but not to a moving complete rod. A number of replications of this demonstration have been carried out in different contexts and in different age groups (Johnson & Aslin,
1995,
1996; Johnson & Nañez,
1995; Kellman, Gleitman, & Spelke,
1987; Kellman, Spelke, & Short,
1986; Slater et al.,
1990). All these studies demonstrate that coherently moving parts sticking out from behind an occluder are perceived by infants as belonging to the same object. Recently, Johnson, Slemmer, and Amso (
2004) studied the scanning patterns of 3-month-old infants while they habituated to this type of stimuli. It was found that those infants, whose post-habituation preferences could be interpreted as unity perception, scanned more frequently around the rod and across the range of its motion. Thus, the infants scanned systematically in a way that optimized the intake of the important information for unity perception.
The second kind of evidence of the development of global motion perception comes from visual evoked potentials (Braddick et al.,
2005; Wattam-Bell, Birtles, Braddick, & Atkinson,
2005). The results of these studies suggest that both global and local motion processing and local form processing precede development of global form processing. On the basis of these results Braddick et al. (
2005) suggested that extra-striate global mechanisms for motion become functional soon after cortical directional selectivity has developed.
The third evidence of early expressions of global motion perception comes from the study of directional eye movements (Kowler & McKee,
1987). In this method an observer, unaware of the direction of stimulus motion, views the infant's eye movements and/or optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) and takes decision on the direction of the gaze movements. The assumption is that the infants will move their eyes in the direction of the perceived motion. Using this measurement, Manny and Fern (
1990) found that 1- to 3-month-old infants show eye movements in the direction of coherent motion when seeing a single grating or a plaid composed of two perpendicular gratings through a round aperture. Dobkins, Fine, Hsueh, and Vitten (
2004) made the task more complicated. They presented 2- to 5-month-old infants with a field of moving grating apertures. Each of them contained one of two motion directions, and they were placed across the screen in a counterbalanced order. Dobkins et al. (
2004) showed that all infants could integrate component motions into coherent global pattern motion and this integration occurred over rather large regions of space.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the evolving relationship between perceived global motion and smooth pursuit eye movements (SP) in development. Although the results of Dobkins et al. (
2004) show that infants' eye movements are related to the global motion of a composite motion display, they did not investigate whether those eye movements are smooth or saccadic. This is an important question because it informs about how SP is controlled. One possibility is that SP is controlled by single motion elements on the retina, i.e. “retinal slip” (Leigh & Zee,
1999; Robinson,
1965). The alternative is that SP is controlled by the integrated global motion of displayed motion elements. Another way to formulate this question is to ask whether SP is controlled by internal or external coordinates.
Perceiving the coherent motion of a composite motion pattern is a necessary but not a sufficient condition for stabilizing gaze on it with smooth pursuit. Earlier research indicates that infants perceive the global motion of a group of motion components from at least 2 months of age (Dobkins et al.,
2004). Smooth pursuit of horizontal linear motion reaches an adult-like level around 4 months of age (Rosander & von Hofsten,
2000,
2002; von Hofsten & Rosander,
1997). Thus, from that age, the degree by which infants use perceived object motion to regulate smooth pursuit of the motion should be a reliable indicator how well both parts of the system are integrated.
In the present study we compared the smooth pursuit response of 5- and 9-month-old infants and adults to a line-figure rhombus (see
Figure 1 in the
General methods section; stimulus adapted from Beutter and Stone,
2000) moving horizontally behind 3 stationary vertical occluders. Three sets of questions were asked. The first one had to do with the conditions under which infants perceive the global motion of the partly occluded line-figure rhombus. In adults, it relates to the contrast between the moving segments and the occluders. Beutter and Stone (
2000), Lorenceau and Shiffrar (
1992), and Stone, Beutter, and Lorenceau (
2000) have shown that a simple change in the luminance of the occluders has dramatic effects on the perception of the moving segments. If the occluders are visible, adults perceive the global motion of a united object that continues behind the occluding parts, but if the occluders are of the same color as the background, adults only perceive the separate motions of the segments but not the coherent motion of a single object. Do infants perceive these patterns in the same way as adults? If infants perceive global motion in the case of the visible occluders then we should observe that the horizontal component of the SP will be generally larger with the visible occluders than with the invisible ones.
The second set of questions was related to the way the infants track a partly occluded line-figure stimulus. More specifically, do infants, who perceive the global motion of a partly occluded object, track it with smooth pursuit? In other words, the question is whether smooth pursuit is influenced by perceived motion of external objects or by the local displacements of stimulus elements on the retina. To be able to smoothly track the motion of a perceived object from the composite motions of its moving parts requires both perception of its global motion and ability to use this information to regulate smooth pursuit. Although the smooth pursuit of horizontal linear motion is adult-like from around 4 months of age, the neural processes underlying the control of smooth pursuit from perceived global motion of motion fragments may not be mature until much later. Therefore it becomes important to trace this developmental process. In the present study we evaluated infants' tendency to track global motion with smooth pursuit at both 5 and 9 months of age.
The third set of questions was related to how the SP response evolves during the viewing of a group of moving object parts. Is smooth pursuit of the global motion triggered as soon the composite moving stimulus is presented or does the perception of a moving whole become more salient with exposure time? If the latter alternative is valid, it is also possible that the perception of global object motion or the motion of its separate segments can switch back and forth with attentional fluctuations. On the other hand, if the smooth pursuit system becomes more entrained to the perception of global motion over the exposure time, this response will be more dominant toward the end of presentations than at the beginning.