October 2003
Volume 3, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2003
Effects of grey scale range on the detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry
Author Affiliations
  • Sandra Mancini
    Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Canada
Journal of Vision October 2003, Vol.3, 346. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.346
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sandra Mancini, Rick Gurnsey, Sharon L Sally; Effects of grey scale range on the detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry. Journal of Vision 2003;3(9):346. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.346.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

PURPOSE. Points I(x,y) and I(−x,y) are symmetrically placed with respect to the y axis. Zero-mean images possess the property of bilateral symmetry about the y axis if for all (x,y), I(x,y) = I(−x,y), and the property of anti-symmetry if for all (x,y), I(x,y) = −I(−x,y). Mancini, et al. (2001, ARVO) measured sensitivity to symmetry and anti-symmetry as a function of check size for patterns comprising black and white checks. Symmetry and anti-symmetry elicited similar sensitivities for large checks. As check size decreased sensitivity to symmetrical stimuli improved modestly whereas sensitivity to anti-symmetrical stimuli decreased dramatically. We wondered if this pattern of results would hold for the more general case in which stimuli contain a wider range of grey-levels.

METHOD. Symmetrical and anti-symmetrical stimuli were created with checks having intensities drawn from a normal distribution. Check widths ranged from 0.037 to 0.297 of visual angle and all patterns were windowed within a circular aperture of 9.5 in diameter. For each check size, noise masks were created by drawing from the same normal distribution and added to the stimulus. Stimulus contrast (c) and mask contrast (1 - c) summed to 1. Four subjects performed a 2IFC task. One interval contained random noise the other contained symmetry (or anti-symmetry) with some level of added noise; exposure durations and ISIs were 333 ms. Threshold was defined as the stimulus contrast (c) eliciting 82% correct responses.

RESULTS. In most cases thresholds were unmeasurable for the anti-symmetrical stimuli; i.e., even with c = 1 subjects rarely obtained 82% correct responses. For symmetrical stimuli thresholds ranged from 0.63 to 0.70 with no significant effect of check size.

CONCLUSION. Anti-symmetry is extremely difficult if not impossible to detect in the general case. With binary stimuli (Mancini et al., 2001) subjects may be able to detect anti-symmetry by employing attentional strategies.

Mancini, S., Gurnsey, R., Sally, S. L.(2003). Effects of grey scale range on the detection of symmetry and anti-symmetry [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3( 9): 346, 346a, http://journalofvision.org/3/9/346/, doi:10.1167/3.9.346. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.