October 2003
Volume 3, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2003
The site of orientation integration
Author Affiliations
  • Behzad Mansouri
    McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Canada
  • Robert F Hess
    McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Canada
  • Harriet A Allen
    McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Canada
  • Sarah Sebbag
    McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Canada
  • Steven C Dakin
    Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, UK
Journal of Vision October 2003, Vol.3, 456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.456
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Behzad Mansouri, Robert F Hess, Harriet A Allen, Sarah Sebbag, Steven C Dakin; The site of orientation integration. Journal of Vision 2003;3(9):456. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.456.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Purpose. We wanted to know if the site of orientation integration (Dakin, JOSA 2001) was at an early or late stage in the visual pathway relative to the site of binocular integration.

Methods. We used a task in which subjects had to judge the mean orientation of an array of oriented Gabors. The Gabor orientations were samples from a Gaussian orientation distribution of variable bandwidth and mean that was left or right of vertical. The internal noise and number of samples were estimated from fitting a standard summation-variance model to the data. These orientation samples were either presented to one eye or to both eyes under dichoptic viewing. When presented to both eyes they could be in the same disparity plane or in different disparity planes. In some cases, signals of random orientation (termed noise) were added to the signal orientations in one or other of the above conditions.

Results. Performance on this task depended on whether the signal and noise were presented in different disparity planes. Furthermore similar results were obtained for dichoptic and monoptic viewing conditions. Interestingly, noise significantly (p<0.05) disrupts performance when it is presented to the dominant eye, leading to higher thresholds, higher internal noise, and decreased sampling efficiency.

Conclusions. Our results suggest that the site of orientation integration is not only after the site of binocular integration but also after the site where disparity is encoded. The finding that the effectiveness of noise depends on the eye to which it is presented, even though this information is not known to the subject, suggests that there are also monocular pathways through which this type of integration can occur although their sensitivity must be reduced compared with their binocular counterpart.

Mansouri, B., Hess, R. F., Allen, H. A., Sebbag, S., Dakin, S. C.(2003). The site of orientation integration [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3( 9): 456, 456a, http://journalofvision.org/3/9/456/, doi:10.1167/3.9.456. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.