October 2003
Volume 3, Issue 9
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   October 2003
Auditory “capture” of visual motion
Author Affiliations
  • Hyungjun Kim
    Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA
Journal of Vision October 2003, Vol.3, 777. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.777
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Hyungjun Kim, Brian Pasieka, Mark McCourt; Auditory “capture” of visual motion. Journal of Vision 2003;3(9):777. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.777.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

It has recently been shown that aspects of visual perception can be significantly altered by auditory stimuli. We asked whether the perceived direction of visual motion could be affected by auditory signals. The visual stimulus was a spatiotemporally vignetted sinewave grating (0.5 cpd, 5% contrast). Multiple frames of this stimulus were combined into short movies. Each frame lasted 125 ms, and each movie consisted of 3 frames. Between successive frames the spatial phase of the grating was altered, with nine phases sampled, ranging from 90 deg to 270 deg in increments of 18 deg. To investigate the influence of auditory signals on visual motion we paired the presentation of the movies with auditory stimuli. The auditory stimulus was a binaural amplitude-gated burst of pink noise. The total duration of the noisebursts coincided with the duration of the motion movie. The relative onset, temporal phase and amplitude of the noisebursts were controlled to create a virtual soundsource whose location and motion in 3D auditory space could be manipulated. In the rightward sound condition soundsource onset occurred at a point 2 virtual meters to the left of the head and moved at a constant velocity to a location 2 virtual meters to the right of the head. The opposite occurred in the leftward sound condition. In the no motion control condition the two ears received the same toneburst, and the sound appeared stationary and centered within the head. There was also a no sound control condition. On each trial observers were instructed to ignore the auditory stimulus and to judge the direction of visual motion. The perceived direction of visual motion was strongly influenced by the direction of concurrent auditory motion. Auditory motion not only captured ambiguous visual motion, but could even reverse the perceived direction of unambiguous visual motion. These results suggest that visual motion, a dynamic and spatiotemporal aspect of visual perception, can be altered by sound.

Kim, H., Pasieka, B., McCourt, M.(2003). Auditory “capture” of visual motion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3( 9): 777, 777a, http://journalofvision.org/3/9/777/, doi:10.1167/3.9.777. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.