June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Walking perception by walking observers
Author Affiliations
  • Alissa Jacobs
    Rutgers University, Newark, NJ
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.218
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Alissa Jacobs, Maggie Shiffrar; Walking perception by walking observers. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):218. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.218.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Biological motion research traditionally uses stationary observers. However, in the real world, moving observers analyze the actions of others so that they can compare those actions to their own. Using a 2AFC gait speed discrimination task, Experiment 1 examined whether stationary and moving observers perceive human motion differently. Walking and stationary subjects compared the relative gait speeds of two simultaneously presented point-light walkers whose speeds ranged from 2.0 to 6.5 km/hr and always differed by 0.5 km/hr. Walking decreased gait speed sensitivity. Experiment 2 examined whether observers compare their own actions with the actions of others in the same way that they compare the actions of two other people. Subjects either compared their own gait speed with the gait speed of a point-light walker (egocentric) or the gait speeds of two point-light walkers (exocentric). Subjects in both groups walked at identical speeds and performed identical gait speed comparisons. Egocentric, but not exocentric, gait speed perception depended upon observer walking speed. Experiment 3 examined the basis for this difference. Egocentric and exocentric gait speed perception differ in their behavioral relevance and the modalities compared (visual-visual vs. visual-motor). To identify the critical factor, subjects performed the same egocentric gait speed discriminations under behaviorally irrelevant conditions. Subjects and point-light walkers either faced and walked in opposite directions or the same direction. Performance varied as a function of walking direction, suggesting that behaviorally irrelevant experience drives gait speed sensitivity. Thus, the visual analysis of human movement involves different processes depending upon observer movement.

Jacobs, A., Shiffrar, M.(2004). Walking perception by walking observers [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 218, 218a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/218/, doi:10.1167/4.8.218. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.