June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Loss of positional information when tracking multiple dots: The role of memory
Author Affiliations
  • Sathyasri Narasimhan
    Dept. of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.361
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Sathyasri Narasimhan, Srimant P. Tripathy, Brendan T. Barrett; Loss of positional information when tracking multiple dots: The role of memory. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):361. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.361.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Human observers can simultaneously track up to 5 dots, when presented with an array of dots moving in a random manner (Pylyshyn & Storm, 1988, Spatial Vision, 3, 179–197). However, the ability to detect deviations in straight-line trajectories is severely compromised when attending to two or more trajectories (Tripathy & Barrett, 2003, Journal of Vision, 3, 340a). Here we investigate the contribution of short-term memory to this loss of positional information. In previous experiments, the stimuli were several linear, non-parallel, left-to-right trajectories, each moving at the same speed. At the monitor's midline indicated by vertical markers (reached simultaneously by all trajectories), one of the trajectories (the target trajectory) deviated clockwise/anticlockwise. The angle of deviation was varied between trials using a method of constant stimuli. The observer reported the direction of deviation and thresholds were determined. Deviation thresholds rose steeply when the number of distractor trajectories was increased from 0 (typical threshold=2°) to 3 (typically over 40°). We modified the above stimulus so that all distractor trajectories disappeared on reaching the monitor's midline; only the target trajectory continued on the right half of the screen. Surprisingly, the observers still performed poorly; the task was impossible to perform when there were more than four distractor trajectories. Even for these simple linear/bilinear trajectories with the latter half of the target trajectory clearly identified, observers had little access to information regarding the first half of the target trajectory. This result represents a limitation of short-term memory, possibly as a consequence of attention not being directed to the first half of the target trajectory.

Narasimhan, S., Tripathy, S. P., Barrett, B. T.(2004). Loss of positional information when tracking multiple dots: The role of memory [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 361, 361a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/361/, doi:10.1167/4.8.361. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.