June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Attention-mediated capacity limits in visual form processing
Author Affiliations
  • Jason S. McCarley
    Mississippi State University, USA
  • Jeffrey R. W. Mounts
    Suny-Geneseo, USA
  • Aaron Hartman
    Suny-Geneseo, USA
  • Arthuer F. Kramer
    University of Illinois, USA
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.449
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Jason S. McCarley, Jeffrey R. W. Mounts, Aaron Hartman, Arthuer F. Kramer; Attention-mediated capacity limits in visual form processing. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):449. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.449.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Background: Modern theorists conceptualize visual selective attention as a competition between objects for the control of extrastriate responses (e.g., Duncan & Desimone, 1995). Implicit in the notion of attention as a competition for spatially selective neural resources is the hypothesis that objects within a limited region of the visual field should be difficult to represent simultaneously, but that spatially separated objects might be attended and represented in parallel and without interference. Here, we used analysis of response time distributions (Townsend & Nozawa, 1995) in a redundant-targets shape-identification task to test this prediction. Method: Subjects were asked to identify the shape of (a) a single target object or (b) a pair of identical target objects. The spatial separation between redundant targets varied. Targets appeared embedded within a ring of task-irrelevant distractors, such that the number and density of stimuli was held constant across conditions. The only systematic differences between displays were in the number and position of attended objects. Results: When redundant target objects were adjacent to one another, performance matched the predictions of a serial or fixed-capacity parallel model. When targets were spatially separated, performance showed evidence of parallel processing with some excess capacity. Even at the largest target separations tested, however, processing capacity remained limited. Conclusions: Results indicate that attention-mediated capacity limits constrain perceptual processing within small regions of the visual field, but suggest that higher-level processing limits may also exist.

McCarley, J. S., Mounts, J. R. W., Hartman, A., Kramer, A. F.(2004). Attention-mediated capacity limits in visual form processing [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 449, 449a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/449/, doi:10.1167/4.8.449. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.