June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Probing the nature of object representations with repetition blindness for rotated objects
Author Affiliations
  • Irina M. Harris
    Macquarie University, Australia
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 506. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.506
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Irina M. Harris, Paul E. Dux; Probing the nature of object representations with repetition blindness for rotated objects. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):506. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.506.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

We addressed the question of whether object recognition is orientation-invariant or orientation-dependent using a repetition blindness (RB) paradigm. RB manifests as a reduction in the ability to report a repeated stimulus if it occurs within ~400 ms of the first occurrence of the item, and is usually interpreted as a failure to assign distinct episodic tokens to the same visual type. This makes RB an ideal tool with which to investigate what kinds of representations are treated as the same by the visual system. We tested whether RB can be obtained for repeated objects (with or without a usual upright orientation) that were presented either in identical orientations or differed by 30, 60, 90, or 180 . Significant RB was obtained for all orientation conditions, consistent with the idea that early stages of object recognition are mediated by orientation-invariant representations. However, RB was often reduced when objects with a usual upright orientation were presented upright and upside-down. An additional experiment showed that the 0 and 180 orientations are determined more easily than other orientations. This appears to help subjects encode the repeated objects as different episodes, and thus reduces susceptibility to RB. The results indicate that, although object recognition is mediated by orientation-invariant representations, orientation plays an important role in establishing distinct episodic representations of objects, enabling one to report them as separate events. They also suggest that the usual upright orientation of an object — if it exists — is stored in memory and primes orientations in which the top-bottom axis of the object is aligned with that stored in memory.

Harris, I. M., Dux, P. E.(2004). Probing the nature of object representations with repetition blindness for rotated objects [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 506, 506a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/506/, doi:10.1167/4.8.506. [CrossRef]
 This work was supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Australian Research Council and an Early Career Researcher Grant from Macquarie University

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.