June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Effects of contrast and attention on chromatic vs. achromatic motion processing
Author Affiliations
  • Amira A. Rezec
    University of California, San Diego, USA
  • Bart Krekelberg
    Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla CA, USA
  • Karen R. Dobkins
    University of California, San Diego, USA
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 553. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.553
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Amira A. Rezec, Bart Krekelberg, Karen R. Dobkins; Effects of contrast and attention on chromatic vs. achromatic motion processing. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.553.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

PURPOSE: Directing attention toward a stimulus enhances motion processing for various types of motion stimuli and tasks. It has been suggested that attention may play a greater role for chromatic (red/green), than for achromatic (black/white), motion processing. To investigate this possibility, we measured the effect of attention on the duration of the motion after-effect (MAE) over a range of cone contrasts for both chromatic and achromatic stimuli. METHODS: Stimuli were achromatic or isoluminant chromatic sine wave gratings presented at 8 different cone contrasts (3–25%). For each stimulus contrast, MAE duration was obtained for two conditions: 1) Full Attention- subjects were instructed to attend to the adapting motion stimulus, and 2) Poor Attention- subjects were instructed to perform an attentionally demanding vowel detection task in the center of gaze during adaptation. Thus, subjects' attention to the adapting stimulus was greatly diminished in condition #2. In both conditions, a dynamic test stimulus was presented after 30 seconds of adaptation. Subjects responded with a key press to indicate when the MAE was no longer perceived. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: The influence of attention on MAE duration for chromatic and achromatic stimuli was very similar (1.4 fold) and constant over all stimulus contrasts. Hence, for these stimuli and with the MAE duration as a measure of motion strength, chromatic motion does not appear to rely more on attentional processing than achromatic motion.

Rezec, A. A., Krekelberg, B., Dobkins, K. R.(2004). Effects of contrast and attention on chromatic vsachromatic motion processing [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 553, 553a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/553/, doi:10.1167/4.8.553. [CrossRef]
 Support — EY12153 (KRD)

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.