June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Smooth-pursuit eye movements at low stimulus contrast
Author Affiliations
  • Miriam Spering
    Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
  • Dirk Kerzel
    Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
  • Dirk Neumann
    California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA
  • Doris I. Braun
    Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
  • Michael J. Hawken
    New York University, New York, USA
  • Karl R. Gegenfurtner
    Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 648. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.648
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Miriam Spering, Dirk Kerzel, Dirk Neumann, Doris I. Braun, Michael J. Hawken, Karl R. Gegenfurtner; Smooth-pursuit eye movements at low stimulus contrast. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):648. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.648.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

The perception of speed and the ability to show smooth-pursuit eye movements depend on stimulus contrast for stimuli well above the detection threshold (Hawken & Gegenfurtner, 2001). We studied pursuit eye movements elicited by targets with contrasts ranging from just below individual thresholds (0.8–10 times threshold) to 100% contrast. Stimuli were Gabor patches at three different speeds (1, 8, 16 deg/s) and four spatial frequencies (0, 1, 4, 8 c/deg). Targets appeared randomly to the left or right of a central fixation spot in a step-ramp paradigm and moved towards the fovea. Eye movements were measured with an EyeLink II system. At the end of each trial, subjects had to rate target direction and velocity. We used the method of constant stimuli with contrast starting values derived from a staircase procedure prior to the main experiment. We analyzed only those trials where the psychophysical judgement was correct and determined smooth-pursuit latency, steady-state gain, and position error. Results show that pursuit significantly depends on stimulus contrast: Gain increased and latency decreased with contrast. For all stimuli well above threshold, the effect was small. However, below a contrast level of two to three times the threshold, pursuit was severely impaired for medium and high target speeds: Pursuit latency was long, steady-state gain was low, and position error was high. Furthermore, latency and gain for medium and high target speeds varied with spatial frequency. For fast targets with high spatial frequency, most of the foveation was obtained by saccades. We conclude that poor signal quality at contrast levels around perceptual threshold makes it difficult for the pursuit system to reliably estimate velocity. The signals that drive perception of low contrast stimuli are not sufficient to guide the smooth-pursuit system. Therefore, a correct judgement of target direction and velocity does not necessarily imply that a stimulus can be pursued properly.

Spering, M., Kerzel, D., Neumann, D., Braun, D. I., Hawken, M. J., Gegenfurtner, K. R.(2004). Smooth-pursuit eye movements at low stimulus contrast [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 648, 648a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/648/, doi:10.1167/4.8.648. [CrossRef]
 Miriam Spering was supported by the DFG graduate program “Brain and Behavior” (DFG 885/1).

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.