June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Perceptual completion is not better within than across hemispheres
Author Affiliations
  • Patrick J. Bennett
    Department of Psychology, McMaster University, Canada
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 718. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.718
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Patrick J. Bennett, Masayoshi Nagai, Allison B. Sekuler; Perceptual completion is not better within than across hemispheres. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):718. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.718.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

Pillow and Rubin (2002) found that shape judgments of figures that could contain illusory contours were poorer when the illusory contours crossed the vertical meridian than when it crossed the horizontal meridian. These results were interpreted as meaning perceptual integration is more difficult across hemispheres than within a hemisphere. However, because no baseline measure of perceptual completion (PC) was included, it is unclear whether their results were due to completion per se. Here, we re-examine the issue, comparing results when completion was expected (illusory contour conditions) and when PC was not possible (fragmented control condition). In all experiments, we asked observers to make shape judgments and varied the orientation of local inducing elements until performance reached our threshold criterion (staircase method). Expt 1 included both illusory and fragmented control figures, and stimulus duration was approximately 140 ms, about 45 ms longer than that of Pillow and Rubin. We found no consistent hemisphere effect, and only a few participants showed evidence of PC. In Expt 2, we changed the instructions to emphasize the presence of illusory contours. More participants showed evidence of PC, but we still found no consistent hemisphere effect. In Expt 3, we eliminated the control condition, and reduced the stimulus duration to one closer to Pillow and Rubin's. However, we still found no consistent hemisphere effect. Finally, we reduced the stimulus diameter from 14 to 6 deg, and confirmed that PC could be measured with our procedure, but we still found no consistent hemisphere effect. Overall, unlike Pillow and Rubin, we find no evidence of a hemisphere effect, and no evidence for PC with the large stimuli like those used in the original Pillow and Rubin study. Thus, our results do not support the idea that PC-related integration processes are impaired across hemispheres.

Bennett, P. J., Nagai, M., Sekuler, A. B.(2004). Perceptual completion is not better within than across hemispheres [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 718, 718a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/718/, doi:10.1167/4.8.718. [CrossRef]
 This study was supported by NSERC Discovery grants (42133 & 105494), the Canada Research Chair Program, and JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (No. 200201154).

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.