June 2004
Volume 4, Issue 8
Vision Sciences Society Annual Meeting Abstract  |   August 2004
Modeling metacontrast masking with varying target and mask durations
Author Affiliations
  • Bruce Bridgeman
    University of California, Santa CruzUSA
  • Vincent DiLollo
    University of British Columbia, Canada
  • James Enns
    University of British Columbia, Canada
  • Adrian Muehlenen
    University of British Columbia, Canada
Journal of Vision August 2004, Vol.4, 73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.73
  • Views
  • Share
  • Tools
    • Alerts
      This feature is available to authenticated users only.
      Sign In or Create an Account ×
    • Get Citation

      Bruce Bridgeman, Vincent DiLollo, James Enns, Adrian Muehlenen; Modeling metacontrast masking with varying target and mask durations. Journal of Vision 2004;4(8):73. https://doi.org/10.1167/4.8.73.

      Download citation file:

      © ARVO (1962-2015); The Authors (2016-present)

  • Supplements

In metacontrast, a target is rendered invisible by a surrounding mask that appears after the target's offset, providing a tool for investigating temporal aspects of visual coding. Previous manipulations of target and mask duration have used constant stimulus intensity, so that longer-lasting stimuli appear brighter. When brightness is controlled by compensating longer duration with lower intensity, increasing target duration has little effect on U-shaped metacontrast, but increasing mask duration monotonically decreases target visibility when the mask follows a 10 msec target immediately. These results were simulated with four models: efficient masking (Francis), decaying-trace (Anbar & Anbar), two-channel (Weisstein, 1968), and lateral inhibition (Bridgeman). Using parameters in each model that had successfully simulated metacontrast in the past, the efficient masking model yielded a monotonically increasing function of visibility in as target duration increased, while the other models gave U-shaped functions. Testing the remaining models in the increasing mask duration experiment, the decaying-trace model gave an increasing function where the psychophysics showed a decreasing function, the two-channel model showed a plateau of high visibility at low mask duration while the psychophysical function began declining immediately, and the lateral inhibition model accurately simulated the results. We also tested a recurrent processing model (DiLollo, Enns & Rensink), which did well here but does not have the parameters to test the target-duration condition. The lateral inhibition model performed best overall, perhaps because it relies on distributed coding rather than discrete detectors to simulate target visibility. In a single layer of simulated neurons, each cell inhibits six near neighbors; secondary interactions spread stimulus-specific activity across the network.

Bridgeman, B., DiLollo, V., Enns, J., von  Muehlenen, A.(2004). Modeling metacontrast masking with varying target and mask durations [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4( 8): 73, 73a, http://journalofvision.org/4/8/73/, doi:10.1167/4.8.73. [CrossRef]

This PDF is available to Subscribers Only

Sign in or purchase a subscription to access this content. ×

You must be signed into an individual account to use this feature.